Bizarre Inside Out Star System That Makes No Sense
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Bizarre Discovery in NYC Cemetery Rewrites What We Know About Bees
Anton Petrov
103.5k views
Experiment Makes Something Move at 104% of Speed of Light! The Darkness Inside
Anton Petrov
26.1k views
Strange Discoveries About Runaway Stars That Don't Really Make Sense
Anton Petrov
42.1k views
I Found Out I Have a Weird Brain Condition That Makes Everything Look Static
Anton Petrov
84.2k views
Impossible Radio Signals That Made No Sense Have Been Explained
Anton Petrov
29.1k views
Bizarre Object Detected Gravitationally Makes No Sense
Anton Petrov
5.1k views
This Galaxy Shows Signs of Stars So Massive They Make No Sense
Anton Petrov
78.5k views
Bizarre Structures Inside Blood May Be Responsible for Long COVID
Anton Petrov
50.6k views
Bizarre Rogue Planet Is Growing Faster Than Any Planet Ever Seen
Anton Petrov
68.8k views
South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly Is Growing in a Bizarre Way
Anton Petrov
345.4k views
Top Comments (10)
Title had me thinking the star was orbiting the planets 😅
In his book Cosmos, Carl Sagan et al simulated planet formation in which they produced some planetary systems where the giant planets were closer to the star than the rocky planets were. The simulation they used was probably crude compared to today's, but nonetheless it opened up the possibility to a younger me that not all planetary systems would look like ours.
Maybe this outlier rocky planet wasn't formed in its now host Solar System at all? But, instead, was ejected from another Star System? Meaning, It's just another lost and homeless planet, doing a bit of couchsurfing between gigs? Just a thought, though? 🌑🤔
There are LOTS of Hot Jupiters. How many of them also have undetected rocky planets much further out?
At first I expected a planet in a center of several spinning stars around it
We observe planets with the transit method: We only see them IF they are passing in front of the star from our point of view. Doesn't that create a big bias for observing so many "regular planetary systems" ?
I dunno that I think there are rules for planetary systems so much as "general guidelines," or maybe "statistical tendencies." Shake half a trillion times, and there will be some "variations."
You've talked about the planet creation and current location , but planets can also migrate, which can explain all of it IMO.
Hey, Slartibartfast, you got the plan pages out of order.
Ag3167 is an awesome system, the way they all rotate at right angles to each other would be an amazing sight
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Title had me thinking the star was orbiting the planets 😅
In his book Cosmos, Carl Sagan et al simulated planet formation in which they produced some planetary systems where the giant planets were closer to the star than the rocky planets were. The simulation they used was probably crude compared to today's, but nonetheless it opened up the possibility to a younger me that not all planetary systems would look like ours.
Maybe this outlier rocky planet wasn't formed in its now host Solar System at all? But, instead, was ejected from another Star System? Meaning, It's just another lost and homeless planet, doing a bit of couchsurfing between gigs? Just a thought, though? 🌑🤔
There are LOTS of Hot Jupiters. How many of them also have undetected rocky planets much further out?
At first I expected a planet in a center of several spinning stars around it
We observe planets with the transit method: We only see them IF they are passing in front of the star from our point of view. Doesn't that create a big bias for observing so many "regular planetary systems" ?
I dunno that I think there are rules for planetary systems so much as "general guidelines," or maybe "statistical tendencies." Shake half a trillion times, and there will be some "variations."
You've talked about the planet creation and current location , but planets can also migrate, which can explain all of it IMO.
Hey, Slartibartfast, you got the plan pages out of order.
Ag3167 is an awesome system, the way they all rotate at right angles to each other would be an amazing sight