The Worst Anti-Cheat Ever
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Worst Advice Ever
The PrimeTime
107.7k views
Can it get any worse?
The PrimeTime
176.1k views
WTF Anthropic
The PrimeTime
239.1k views
Worst Onboarding Experience Ever | The Standup
The PrimeTime
67.4k views
I Watched It
ThePrimeTime
210.0k views
What even is Quantum Computing?!
ThePrimeTime
75.4k views
We did it?
ThePrimeTime
102.6k views
What even is an AI Agent?! (The Standup)
ThePrimeTime
91.9k views
The Who Cares Era
ThePrimeTime
139.0k views
Be A Great Programmer
ThePrimeTime
220.0k views
Top Comments (10)
I do love how nearly every AAA multiplayer game has a deeply rooted in your system anticheat, yet fails to do some basic server 'input sanitization'. Like this man has been spinning at a gagillion RPM, moving faster than than character speed limit and is going through coordinates that are clearly walls, "seems good to me, everything is working as intended" says the server
Getting people permanently banned isn't exactly funny. What would be funny is if COD ended up with no players because their anti-cheat is so stupid that it banned them all.
It's dick behaviour but it also never should've been possible. The financial liability for this imho is Activision's fault, because this isn't a 'could happen to anyone' issue. It is the product of negligence AND an insufficient appeal system with human overview. Companies are not entitled to fully automated product aftercare. These bans should have been minor temporary inconveniences at most.
A server-side anticheat incurs unwanted costs to the game publisher. Hence: horrible local spyware-enabled anticheats.
Banning without appeal should be punishable...
If it wasn't for this person making a stink about this issue, it could've gone months without being addressed, leading to many people being permanently banned unjustly for longer periods of time.
About the chatter that mentioned DMAs, they are the reason why some devices don't work with Valorant running. If a device's type can't be identified by Vanguard, it just cuts it off, disabling any connectivity and drivers. And for device types it identifies, it regularly scans its behavior for signs of misbehavior. So if a device doesn't fit an approved shape (as in presents itself as an input device, a drive, a network card, a sound card, or anything identifiable) it's not able to run, and if anything doesn't behave like its category suggests, it's detected and you're part of the next ban wave. Basically 1984 in the computer.
This is one major reason why I prefer to play single-player games
Trolls WILL weaponize all the lazy anticheat patterns.
Some classic “works on my machine so ship it 🚢“
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I do love how nearly every AAA multiplayer game has a deeply rooted in your system anticheat, yet fails to do some basic server 'input sanitization'. Like this man has been spinning at a gagillion RPM, moving faster than than character speed limit and is going through coordinates that are clearly walls, "seems good to me, everything is working as intended" says the server
Getting people permanently banned isn't exactly funny. What would be funny is if COD ended up with no players because their anti-cheat is so stupid that it banned them all.
It's dick behaviour but it also never should've been possible. The financial liability for this imho is Activision's fault, because this isn't a 'could happen to anyone' issue. It is the product of negligence AND an insufficient appeal system with human overview. Companies are not entitled to fully automated product aftercare. These bans should have been minor temporary inconveniences at most.
A server-side anticheat incurs unwanted costs to the game publisher. Hence: horrible local spyware-enabled anticheats.
Banning without appeal should be punishable...
If it wasn't for this person making a stink about this issue, it could've gone months without being addressed, leading to many people being permanently banned unjustly for longer periods of time.
About the chatter that mentioned DMAs, they are the reason why some devices don't work with Valorant running. If a device's type can't be identified by Vanguard, it just cuts it off, disabling any connectivity and drivers. And for device types it identifies, it regularly scans its behavior for signs of misbehavior. So if a device doesn't fit an approved shape (as in presents itself as an input device, a drive, a network card, a sound card, or anything identifiable) it's not able to run, and if anything doesn't behave like its category suggests, it's detected and you're part of the next ban wave. Basically 1984 in the computer.
This is one major reason why I prefer to play single-player games
Trolls WILL weaponize all the lazy anticheat patterns.
Some classic “works on my machine so ship it 🚢“