Navigate Select ESC Close

Science Still Can't Explain Consciousness...Here's Why

2026-04-17 Science & Technology
20.3k
1.4k
448
Arvin Ash
Arvin Ash
1.1m subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

Support the Research Behind this Channel on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/arvinash REFERENCES Quantum consciousness https://youtu.be/bqk1oL42r5s When AI became Self Aware https://youtu.be/afIuJpZNCVA Is consciousness God? https://youtu.be/7bhFvGgKQp4 CHAPTERS 0:00 Why does matter become aware? 0:47 What is consciousness (scientific perspective)? 1:52 WHERE is consciousness?(Scientific perspective)? 4:40 Is quantum mechanics at the root of consciousness? 6:45 The reductionist approach 7:17 "I think therefore I am" 9:22 Three choices for how consciousness emerges 10:39 Penrose and Hameroff idea of entanglement link to consciousness 13:02 Matthew Fisher's idea of nuclear entanglement 15:00 The "Hard Problem" of consciousness 16:25 Solipsism 18:47 Scientific basis of Solipsism 20:27 Is reality objective or subjective? 21:03 Are we in a simulation? 22:45 Are Ais conscious? 25:05 Panpsychism 26:25 Julio Tononi's scientific definition of consciousness 27:55 Could the universe be conscious through black holes 29:20 Does the universe need to be conscious? 31:33 What explains the fine tuning of the universe? 32:30 Where are we? SUMMARY Consciousness is one of the deepest mysteries in modern science. It shapes every thought, sensation, and experience we have—yet despite major advances in neuroscience and physics, we still don’t understand why matter should ever become aware. Is consciousness simply what the brain does, or could it be something more fundamental, built into reality itself? One leading scientific approach is to locate consciousness within the brain. Some researchers point to specific regions, such as the claustrum, as potential “control centers” that integrate information into a unified conscious experience. This view suggests that consciousness is a physical process emerging from neurons, synapses, and brain activity. While this explanation grounds consciousness in biology, it doesn’t make it any less remarkable—it simply means it may be a natural, rather than supernatural, phenomenon. #consciousness But even if consciousness arises from the brain, the brain itself operates according to the laws of physics. This raises a deeper question: could consciousness depend on quantum processes? Some scientists, like Roger Penrose, have proposed that quantum mechanics might play a role in generating conscious experience and even free will. However, this idea is controversial. Critics argue that the brain is too warm and noisy for delicate quantum effects to survive. Alternative proposals, such as nuclear spin mechanisms, attempt to address this issue, but none have been experimentally confirmed. More importantly, even if quantum processes are involved, they still don’t explain the “hard problem” of consciousness—why physical processes give rise to subjective experience, or qualia. This leads to a philosophical challenge: how can we know that other minds exist at all? The idea of solipsism suggests that only your own consciousness can be known with certainty. Science can measure brain activity and behavior, but subjective experience is only accessible from the inside. This creates a fundamental limit—consciousness cannot be directly observed from the outside, making it difficult to fully explain using objective methods. Taking this even further, some theories propose that consciousness is not just produced by brains but is a fundamental feature of reality itself. This idea, known as panpsychism, suggests that consciousness may exist at all levels of the universe. In this view, the cosmos might not just give rise to conscious beings—it might, in some sense, be conscious. In the end, consciousness may be rooted in physical processes, but it also raises questions that extend into physics, philosophy, and cosmology. Until we understand how mind, matter, and time fit together, consciousness remains one of the most profound and unresolved mysteries in science.

Top Comments (10)

@john.john.johnny 2026-04-17

Arvin, HURRY UP figure out consciousness!!!! I'm dying to know.

50 35 replies
@LiamSilverman 2026-04-18

Trying to figure out what consciousness really is seems like trying to pick yourself up with your own arms

46 2 replies
@AContact-x9h 2026-04-17

There's been so many of these types of videos I've seen over the years, and the way you deliver yours still gets me to watch for 30 minutes! That's hard to do for me these days with so much AI slop out there, or rehashes of the same thing. I can tell the hard work you put into these videos, even if it's not just yourself doing it, it's still impressive. I don't regularly give props, so, well done, sir.

23
@RaysDad 2026-04-18

Ask an octopus.

20
@CassianLore 2026-04-17

You could just as easily speculate that consciousness does come form outside the body and the claustrum is the antenna that picks it up.

14 1 replies
@bentationfunkiloglio 2026-04-18

The probe experiment is wildly inadequate if used as an argument that consciousness exists entirely in the claustrum …. IMHO. It’s like claiming electricity exists entirely in wall sockets because lights turn off when unplugged.

11
@maestroarabiya7915 2026-04-17

Wonderful Topic Unique and innovative as always Thank you so much Arvin

4
@wojtekskaba7031 2026-04-17

The most extreme theory maintains that even time doesn't flow. Instead, I - the only being - am frozen in a single moment. Past never existed, future will never happen. Yes, I have a memory of the past events and a memory that future will happen eventually, but it is just an illusion, a false memory syndrome. More than that, I am continuously focused on this very question and only this. I struggle with that idea, reject it, only to fall back to the same question again and again. I believe that sooner or later I will forget about this question, but find myself stuck with the same question and a memory that I was not stuck. There is no even a contemplation of that question, no weighing arguments for and against, just this very idea that is concurrently rejected and impossible to disprove. No, no, I do not believe in that "theory" but cannot find a strong argument against it.

2
@JackFrost-b3q 2026-04-17

Great summary! 👌

2
@Gaius315 2026-04-18

When I first read about Dr. Penrose's idea, it really blew my mind. I truly think they were on to something.

1

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot