Navigate Select ESC Close

Science Still Can't Explain Consciousness...Here's Why

2026-04-17 Science & Technology
20.3k
1.4k
448
Arvin Ash
Arvin Ash
1.1m subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

Support the Research Behind this Channel on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/arvinash REFERENCES Quantum consciousness https://youtu.be/bqk1oL42r5s When AI became Self Aware https://youtu.be/afIuJpZNCVA Is consciousness God? https://youtu.be/7bhFvGgKQp4 CHAPTERS 0:00 Why does matter become aware? 0:47 What is consciousness (scientific perspective)? 1:52 WHERE is consciousness?(Scientific perspective)? 4:40 Is quantum mechanics at the root of consciousness? 6:45 The reductionist approach 7:17 "I think therefore I am" 9:22 Three choices for how consciousness emerges 10:39 Penrose and Hameroff idea of entanglement link to consciousness 13:02 Matthew Fisher's idea of nuclear entanglement 15:00 The "Hard Problem" of consciousness 16:25 Solipsism 18:47 Scientific basis of Solipsism 20:27 Is reality objective or subjective? 21:03 Are we in a simulation? 22:45 Are Ais conscious? 25:05 Panpsychism 26:25 Julio Tononi's scientific definition of consciousness 27:55 Could the universe be conscious through black holes 29:20 Does the universe need to be conscious? 31:33 What explains the fine tuning of the universe? 32:30 Where are we? SUMMARY Consciousness is one of the deepest mysteries in modern science. It shapes every thought, sensation, and experience we have—yet despite major advances in neuroscience and physics, we still don’t understand why matter should ever become aware. Is consciousness simply what the brain does, or could it be something more fundamental, built into reality itself? One leading scientific approach is to locate consciousness within the brain. Some researchers point to specific regions, such as the claustrum, as potential “control centers” that integrate information into a unified conscious experience. This view suggests that consciousness is a physical process emerging from neurons, synapses, and brain activity. While this explanation grounds consciousness in biology, it doesn’t make it any less remarkable—it simply means it may be a natural, rather than supernatural, phenomenon. #consciousness But even if consciousness arises from the brain, the brain itself operates according to the laws of physics. This raises a deeper question: could consciousness depend on quantum processes? Some scientists, like Roger Penrose, have proposed that quantum mechanics might play a role in generating conscious experience and even free will. However, this idea is controversial. Critics argue that the brain is too warm and noisy for delicate quantum effects to survive. Alternative proposals, such as nuclear spin mechanisms, attempt to address this issue, but none have been experimentally confirmed. More importantly, even if quantum processes are involved, they still don’t explain the “hard problem” of consciousness—why physical processes give rise to subjective experience, or qualia. This leads to a philosophical challenge: how can we know that other minds exist at all? The idea of solipsism suggests that only your own consciousness can be known with certainty. Science can measure brain activity and behavior, but subjective experience is only accessible from the inside. This creates a fundamental limit—consciousness cannot be directly observed from the outside, making it difficult to fully explain using objective methods. Taking this even further, some theories propose that consciousness is not just produced by brains but is a fundamental feature of reality itself. This idea, known as panpsychism, suggests that consciousness may exist at all levels of the universe. In this view, the cosmos might not just give rise to conscious beings—it might, in some sense, be conscious. In the end, consciousness may be rooted in physical processes, but it also raises questions that extend into physics, philosophy, and cosmology. Until we understand how mind, matter, and time fit together, consciousness remains one of the most profound and unresolved mysteries in science.

Top Comments (10)

@LiamSilverman 2026-04-18

Trying to figure out what consciousness really is seems like trying to pick yourself up with your own arms

295 63 replies
@finalfantasy82 2026-04-19

Me : "I think. Therefore I am." The Architect : "The hell you are."

70 6 replies
@Obi-Joan 2026-04-19

As Bertrand Russell once quoted from a letter sent to him: "I'm so glad you think there may be something in solipsism. I wish there were more of us."

15
@AContact-x9h 2026-04-17

There's been so many of these types of videos I've seen over the years, and the way you deliver yours still gets me to watch for 30 minutes! That's hard to do for me these days with so much AI slop out there, or rehashes of the same thing. I can tell the hard work you put into these videos, even if it's not just yourself doing it, it's still impressive. I don't regularly give props, so, well done, sir.

77 1 replies
@john.john.johnny 2026-04-17

Arvin, HURRY UP figure out consciousness!!!! I'm dying to know.

96 42 replies
@remdev7510 2026-04-18

In pre-computer era, people said dream instead of simulation. Reality could be a more stable dream. The word 'simulation' attempt to make it easier to accept but the opposite occurs. Zhuangzi dreamt he was a joyful butterfly, unaware of being human; upon waking, he questioned if he was a man dreaming of a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming he was a man. I like the neuroscientist Sam Harris approach in "Final Thoughts on Free Will (Episode #241)", thoughts appears in our minds from a prior external cause and not from our control (someone ask you a question, or an event makes you ponder) and some other process seems to only listen to that thought process. At the end of the day we are all the same matter hallucinating individuality. We can rule out tones of aspects that do not need to be considered like objectivity versus subjectivity.

35 15 replies
@sagitarriulus9773 2026-04-17

For that 2014 study of claustrum there was a follow up study in 2019 that couldn’t replicate the results.

56 11 replies
@NoLuv4Hoz 2026-05-07

Your natural delivery and sincere tone are perfectly suited for documentary work and non-fiction commentary. I have no doubt you’ll find great success in those fields.

2
@bunberrier 2026-04-19

31:20 Just a slight push back here: theoretically, if the universe was making decisions, they might be on a scale that we cant observe. For example, if "big bangs" repeated, and we speed them up as sounds we can hear, it might be playing the song "Chopsticks". Conversely, the decisions might be faster than we can detect, so that changes ARE being made constantly but to us it just looks stable. I used to make up bedtime stories like this for the kids, there were two different groups that lived in the same space and were unaware of each other because they lived at different time scales. I called them the Slows and the Quicks.

8 1 replies
@vaibhav_nitesh 2026-06-13

I lost your channel two weeks ago when I had watched your first video, great to have found you.

1

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot