Why We Need Some AI Model Controls
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
AI News: Impressive New Model From Unexpected Company
Matt Wolfe
34.4k views
4 Skills I’m Learning that AI Can’t Replace (backed by data)
Jeff Su
21.5k views
The Only AI Coding Tools Worth Learning in 2026
Tech With Tim
38.1k views
Learning to code has changed
Tech With Tim
174.5k views
Why Are We Consuming Slop?
Moon
15.5k views
Trump WH in DAMAGE CONTROL Mode as Hegseth SCREWS THEM
Legal AF
167.1k views
Playboy Model's Dating Scheme Duped 'Older' Men on Apps: Cops
Law&Crime Network
147.3k views
you need to learn MCP RIGHT NOW!! (Model Context Protocol)
NetworkChuck
788.6k views
Building Your Own Unified AI Assistant Using Claude Code
Unsupervised Learning
248.1k views
We Don’t Need “Gun” Control. We Need “Transgender” Control.
Matt Walsh
220.6k views
Top Comments (10)
SAFE - Safe Access For Everyone
I'm struggling to see how its still open source as we know it, if the models got governed controls implemented in them. Whos gonna be trusted to say whats safe and whats not, and be in control of the models.
The genie is out of the bottle, no going back now
Everything you say makes perfect sense , I am also most concerned with your same concerns instead of the corrupt regulation concern but it relies on the fact that people are good and not corrupt , will cooperate and the system is psychopath safe. Unfortunately any system with power will inevitably become corrupt and self serving. Need to find a way to zero trust the system of control ans regulation somehow, not sure it's possible
The problem with small degree, is that it never stops at small.
It is always interesting to hear from veterans in the field, rather than freshly minted grads with very limited real-world experience. I often find myself asking what old school experts like Kevin Kelly, Jaron Lanier and Bruce Sterling now think about the current capabilities. On the other hand, maybe we no longer have control over the acceleration, and as AWG claims, we are about to experience all the science fiction scenarios ever imagined?
Daniel, you're right about this, the risks of getting it wrong are equally terrible in both directions, Daniel Schmachtenberger has given great talks on this, years ago! Check him out if you haven't already.
The SAFE Project: https://oursafe.ai/
Spot on, Dan! Thanks for speaking up on this. The sci-fi analogy is excellent. We all need some distance, different angles and objectivity in order to start understanding where we're headed and why careful regulations are needed.
99% of people won't know it's "SAFE" ? I had Fable restrict "an unsafe conversation" when I asked it to answer a riddle. I think we're a loooong way from having a model that has useful safeguards.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
SAFE - Safe Access For Everyone
I'm struggling to see how its still open source as we know it, if the models got governed controls implemented in them. Whos gonna be trusted to say whats safe and whats not, and be in control of the models.
The genie is out of the bottle, no going back now
Everything you say makes perfect sense , I am also most concerned with your same concerns instead of the corrupt regulation concern but it relies on the fact that people are good and not corrupt , will cooperate and the system is psychopath safe. Unfortunately any system with power will inevitably become corrupt and self serving. Need to find a way to zero trust the system of control ans regulation somehow, not sure it's possible
The problem with small degree, is that it never stops at small.
It is always interesting to hear from veterans in the field, rather than freshly minted grads with very limited real-world experience. I often find myself asking what old school experts like Kevin Kelly, Jaron Lanier and Bruce Sterling now think about the current capabilities. On the other hand, maybe we no longer have control over the acceleration, and as AWG claims, we are about to experience all the science fiction scenarios ever imagined?
Daniel, you're right about this, the risks of getting it wrong are equally terrible in both directions, Daniel Schmachtenberger has given great talks on this, years ago! Check him out if you haven't already.
The SAFE Project: https://oursafe.ai/
Spot on, Dan! Thanks for speaking up on this. The sci-fi analogy is excellent. We all need some distance, different angles and objectivity in order to start understanding where we're headed and why careful regulations are needed.
99% of people won't know it's "SAFE" ? I had Fable restrict "an unsafe conversation" when I asked it to answer a riddle. I think we're a loooong way from having a model that has useful safeguards.