LIVE | Karen Read Appeals Again. Commonwealth Motion for Sanctions
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Civil cases back in court for discovery fights.
Emily D. Baker
73.3k views
LIVE COURT | UT v. Kouri Richins - Motion Hearings Day 1
Emily D. Baker
75.9k views
Karen Read Grand Juror Charged with leaking information?
Emily D. Baker
193.6k views
Karen Read Case Cost. Commissioner Cox & Officer Dever. Sarah Boone lawyer issues, again.
Emily D. Baker
188.3k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 23 - Commonwealth Rests with Karen Reads words. Welcher testimony done.
Emily D. Baker
346.9k views
MA v Karen Read Retrial Day 17 - will we see the commonwealths new medical expert?
Emily D. Baker
390.3k views
LIVE COURT | Legal Coverage Karen Read Motions Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
197.7k views
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Pre-Trial Hearing, Motions and New Rulings.
Emily D. Baker
211.1k views
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Motions -- Will the Trial get delayed?
Emily D. Baker
289.5k views
LIVE COURT | MA v. Karen Read - Motion to Dismiss Hearing
Emily D. Baker
289.4k views
Top Comments (10)
The declaration of a mistrial in Karen Read trial #1 was both Unjust AND Legal. I think a lot of us are trying to come to terms with this paradox.
I came in thinking she was going to be guilty. I only knew a brother in blue had been killed. By the end of the trial I was furious that cops did JO dirty by not conducting a proper investigation.
I find it so frustrating that Judge Canone didn't seem concerned by all of the things the CW did - and did not do - regarding providing the defense information and evidence, a potential violation of law, but becomes livid when the CW suggests the defense may have violated her order to not talk to ARRCA.
Since Emily was enjoying Judge Selya's writing so much, I thought I'd point out that Wikipedia has a full section dedicated to his writing style. "As a private practitioner, Selya was often lulled to sleep by the legalese and boilerplate rhetoric in judicial opinions, a matter he has sought to remedy since ascending to the bench: 'I made a commitment to myself that I would attempt to prove that sound jurisprudence and interesting prose are not mutually exclusive.' Selya disclaims 'lexiphanicism for its own sake.' For Selya, precision is a precondition for his use of a word, and '[i]f it does not fit, I won't submit.'"
Three lawyers walk into a bar, and the bartender says "Get out, you're barred!"
EDB: "What are winter tires?" Germany: "Girl! You're adorable!"
I laughed way too hard at the “run away juror” side quest. So wild 😂
It kinda blows my mind that the commonwealth doesn't just drop counts 1 and 3 knowing what they know
The weirdest "snow day" happened when my son was 5. Not a single flake fell so I had a very confused little boy who was disappointed he couldn't build a snowman 🤣
Seems like a jury instruction should be the prosecution has the burden of proof not the defences so the jury room should always start off with innocent and go over if the prosecution proved their case and that defense put doubt in their mind. Starting with guilty is putting the burden on the defense.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
The declaration of a mistrial in Karen Read trial #1 was both Unjust AND Legal. I think a lot of us are trying to come to terms with this paradox.
I came in thinking she was going to be guilty. I only knew a brother in blue had been killed. By the end of the trial I was furious that cops did JO dirty by not conducting a proper investigation.
I find it so frustrating that Judge Canone didn't seem concerned by all of the things the CW did - and did not do - regarding providing the defense information and evidence, a potential violation of law, but becomes livid when the CW suggests the defense may have violated her order to not talk to ARRCA.
Since Emily was enjoying Judge Selya's writing so much, I thought I'd point out that Wikipedia has a full section dedicated to his writing style. "As a private practitioner, Selya was often lulled to sleep by the legalese and boilerplate rhetoric in judicial opinions, a matter he has sought to remedy since ascending to the bench: 'I made a commitment to myself that I would attempt to prove that sound jurisprudence and interesting prose are not mutually exclusive.' Selya disclaims 'lexiphanicism for its own sake.' For Selya, precision is a precondition for his use of a word, and '[i]f it does not fit, I won't submit.'"
Three lawyers walk into a bar, and the bartender says "Get out, you're barred!"
EDB: "What are winter tires?" Germany: "Girl! You're adorable!"
I laughed way too hard at the “run away juror” side quest. So wild 😂
It kinda blows my mind that the commonwealth doesn't just drop counts 1 and 3 knowing what they know
The weirdest "snow day" happened when my son was 5. Not a single flake fell so I had a very confused little boy who was disappointed he couldn't build a snowman 🤣
Seems like a jury instruction should be the prosecution has the burden of proof not the defences so the jury room should always start off with innocent and go over if the prosecution proved their case and that defense put doubt in their mind. Starting with guilty is putting the burden on the defense.