Changing the World (Literally), with Daniele Visione & Holly Buck
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Is Reality Really Real? With Donald Hoffman
StarTalk
138.6k views
What Are We Replacing the ISS With? With Ariel Ekblaw
StarTalk
92.3k views
There Is No AI Really (It’s Just People), with Jaron Lanier
StarTalk
79.8k views
The Science of Gardening, with EpicGardening
StarTalk
37.2k views
Answering Questions All About Aliens, with Charles Liu
StarTalk
25.0k views
Did Life Come From An Asteroid? With Harold Connolly Jr.
StarTalk
165.7k views
Exploring Hidden Dimensions with Brian Greene
StarTalk
180.0k views
The Missions Bringing Us Back to the Moon
StarTalk
606.2k views
Christa Miller - “Shrinking” Feels Like Therapy For Her, Literally | The Daily Show
The Daily Show
44.8k views
Why We’re Going Back to Venus, with David Grinspoon
StarTalk
98.9k views
Top Comments (10)
it's so interesting to watch how Chuck gets closer and closer to a scholar with every episode
I feel like Gary's main role is to bring the conversation back to a serious tone. He's like "WE CAN'T ALL BE COMEDIANS FOLKS"
Gary kept everyone in line. He was really on, concerned, asking great questions - Love it!
It’s so awesome watching chuck getting smarter and smarter in all these subjects every episode. He retains all this information also. Chucks got the best job doing this.
Only podcast worth watching I swear, thank you Neil and everyone who appears on these episodes~
LOVE me some Star Talk.
This was an extremely interesting discussion but there was one point that came to mind that I didn’t hear anyone address. Historically, every emerging technology has had potential consequences that needed to be studied but one that often gets overlooked is that there are always those who will approach that same technology from the perspective of, “ what potential does this have to be weaponized”? The problem this presents is that governments have always been more willing to allocate huge sums of money on the possibility of developing new weaponry to obtain a strategic advantage than they have to find solutions that might benefit mankind as a whole. Just thought that this might also need to be taken into consideration?
Omg! Chuck needs a sitcom where he's an eccentric scientist
Thank you so much for having a Sociologist on here. Far too often in scientific circles the social science perspectives are left out.
Thanks for keeping the boys in line, Gary!
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
it's so interesting to watch how Chuck gets closer and closer to a scholar with every episode
I feel like Gary's main role is to bring the conversation back to a serious tone. He's like "WE CAN'T ALL BE COMEDIANS FOLKS"
Gary kept everyone in line. He was really on, concerned, asking great questions - Love it!
It’s so awesome watching chuck getting smarter and smarter in all these subjects every episode. He retains all this information also. Chucks got the best job doing this.
Only podcast worth watching I swear, thank you Neil and everyone who appears on these episodes~
LOVE me some Star Talk.
This was an extremely interesting discussion but there was one point that came to mind that I didn’t hear anyone address. Historically, every emerging technology has had potential consequences that needed to be studied but one that often gets overlooked is that there are always those who will approach that same technology from the perspective of, “ what potential does this have to be weaponized”? The problem this presents is that governments have always been more willing to allocate huge sums of money on the possibility of developing new weaponry to obtain a strategic advantage than they have to find solutions that might benefit mankind as a whole. Just thought that this might also need to be taken into consideration?
Omg! Chuck needs a sitcom where he's an eccentric scientist
Thank you so much for having a Sociologist on here. Far too often in scientific circles the social science perspectives are left out.
Thanks for keeping the boys in line, Gary!