The Cancelling of Andrew Huberman
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
The Serious Benefits Of Retardmaxxing - Andrew Huberman
Chris Williamson
59.0k views
Science & Tools of Learning & Memory | Dr. David Eagleman
Andrew Huberman
42.3k views
The #1 Habit for Productivity - Dr Andrew Huberman
Chris Williamson
104.9k views
The Science of Making & Breaking Habits | Huberman Lab Essentials
Andrew Huberman
54.4k views
The Chemistry of Food & Taste | Dr. Harold McGee
Andrew Huberman
90.9k views
The Science & Practice of Perfecting Your Sleep | Huberman Lab Essentials
Andrew Huberman
216.9k views
Healing From Grief & Loss | Dr. Mary-Frances O'Connor
Andrew Huberman
120.1k views
Andrew Huberman | This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von #585
Theo Von
1.6m views
The Science & Art of Comedy & Creativity | Tom Segura
Andrew Huberman
126.8k views
The Science of Emotions & Relationships | Huberman Lab Essentials
Andrew Huberman
570.3k views
Top Comments (10)
At University professors told us that Wikipedia is a terrible source but it's a very good source to check for other sources.
I'm shocked that youtube didn't put up a wiki banner that says" we have investigated ourselves and have determined we are correct in all things"
Most articles on Wikipedia are accurate and based on reliable credible sources. However, it cannot be ignored that in many articles about history, politics, etc., propaganda is made with the cherrypicking method.
Wikipedia is very good for general research as long as its unrelated to politics, then its biased as hell. Edit: To clarify, By 'things related to politics' I don't just mean things related to elections and politicans, I'm also talking about everything from climate change to history which is being altered or exaggerated to push a narrative. It has decent information on things like my profile picture for example because it's just a painting.
Finally, someone that is actually revealing the how terrible Wikipedia is to a large audience. Maybe people will actually stop using Wikipedia now.
I’m from France and from Primary school until College we were always told that Wikipedia isn’t fully accurate and I never thought to believe so until a few months ago when realizing how Wikipedia content can be so easily manipulated and changed and how the Wikipedia hierarchy works.
Like all projects that get touched by any ideological nerd, Wikipedia was also a victim.
Our teacher taught us about an non existing country (but talked about it like it was real), we laughed him off like he was crazy and he showed us a wikipedia page about it. We all shut up and apologized. After that he laughed us off because the country of course didnt exist. Somebody just faked a whole country with flag, symbols, government... And got it published for a long time. From that point on I havent used wiki for factual information, only the sources it listed. Idk how it got so much good reputation and how everybody uses it without questioning. If a totally non existing country can be published for months/years on wikipedia without getting deleted or updated, imagine how much smaller fake info there can be without anyone questioning it at all.
Check out Canldestick AI today: https://candlestick.ai/register/early Free weekly essays written by Moon - https://mailchi.mp/3ded12821743/moon Support the channel here (all money goes straight back into the channel): ► Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/MoonReal ► Follow my Twitter: https://twitter.com/MoonRealYT
We now use the word "Google" the same way we use the words "Kleenex" and "Xerox." The difference is that tissues and copiers are not trying to manage the way you think.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
At University professors told us that Wikipedia is a terrible source but it's a very good source to check for other sources.
I'm shocked that youtube didn't put up a wiki banner that says" we have investigated ourselves and have determined we are correct in all things"
Most articles on Wikipedia are accurate and based on reliable credible sources. However, it cannot be ignored that in many articles about history, politics, etc., propaganda is made with the cherrypicking method.
Wikipedia is very good for general research as long as its unrelated to politics, then its biased as hell. Edit: To clarify, By 'things related to politics' I don't just mean things related to elections and politicans, I'm also talking about everything from climate change to history which is being altered or exaggerated to push a narrative. It has decent information on things like my profile picture for example because it's just a painting.
Finally, someone that is actually revealing the how terrible Wikipedia is to a large audience. Maybe people will actually stop using Wikipedia now.
I’m from France and from Primary school until College we were always told that Wikipedia isn’t fully accurate and I never thought to believe so until a few months ago when realizing how Wikipedia content can be so easily manipulated and changed and how the Wikipedia hierarchy works.
Like all projects that get touched by any ideological nerd, Wikipedia was also a victim.
Our teacher taught us about an non existing country (but talked about it like it was real), we laughed him off like he was crazy and he showed us a wikipedia page about it. We all shut up and apologized. After that he laughed us off because the country of course didnt exist. Somebody just faked a whole country with flag, symbols, government... And got it published for a long time. From that point on I havent used wiki for factual information, only the sources it listed. Idk how it got so much good reputation and how everybody uses it without questioning. If a totally non existing country can be published for months/years on wikipedia without getting deleted or updated, imagine how much smaller fake info there can be without anyone questioning it at all.
Check out Canldestick AI today: https://candlestick.ai/register/early Free weekly essays written by Moon - https://mailchi.mp/3ded12821743/moon Support the channel here (all money goes straight back into the channel): ► Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/MoonReal ► Follow my Twitter: https://twitter.com/MoonRealYT
We now use the word "Google" the same way we use the words "Kleenex" and "Xerox." The difference is that tissues and copiers are not trying to manage the way you think.