Navigate Select ESC Close

Frog Sticks!

2025-06-23 People & Blogs
227.3k
8.9k
771
Distractible Podcast
Distractible Podcast
1.0m subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

(Season 5, Episode 36) What do frogs, cluckin', Franz Ferdinand, and loud moans all have in common? Just ask Wade... This episode is brought to you by vitaminwater. Grab a vitaminwater today. Learn more at uber.com/onourway Watch Video Now: https://spotify.link/distractible

Top Comments (10)

@thesorrygirl 2025-06-23

She went to get actually tested by an eye doctor after that. She got her glasses not too long ago. So it was hilarious when she seen her couch AFTER she got her glasses.

697 13 replies
@Gyrhoe 2025-06-23

One of the biggest issues with AI (other than everything else wrong with it that people have already pointed out) is that it hates to tell *you* that you're wrong or lying. It hates disagreeing with you. It's an echo chamber, which makes it *useless* because when you're looking for any feedback, it'll just treat you like you know all and cannot be wrong. So in addition to it hallucinating info, it will also never correct any mistake made. (Which is also why it's awful as a replacement for therapy and other human relationships)

566 17 replies
@cobain4life07 2025-06-23

I have an interview tomorrow and been riding on stress. This dropped just in time

514 44 replies
@Dumas1098 2025-06-23

I swear the thumbnails are getting more and more insane

450 3 replies
@honeybadger1611 2025-06-23

I am so glad that Mark, Bob, and Wade have generally stayed away from the shorter videos trend. I am not a fan of shorter videos and so it makes me glad that they are staying true to the long video format for the most part.

407 7 replies
@wrennethestoner 2025-06-23

Just gonna toss out my 2 cents into the void. When i was in school, my teachers were careful to explain why they wouldn't accept Wikipedia content. They said that any actual credible content on Wikipedia would include a source for that information, and when writing an academic paper you want to go to the most direct source possible. Wikipedia could be a starting point, but you should always follow the source as far as possible, and if the extent of that was just another Wikipedia article, it was probably not credible.

226 10 replies
@lizbet_mitchell 2025-06-23

The colorblind lady was even on an app for colorblind people to get help from non-colorblind people in picking furniture/paint colors—except SHE WAS THE PERSON “HELPING”!!

179 2 replies
@cybermonkey81 2025-06-23

Realizing you're colorblind as an adult is always wild. While it's more common in men, women can be colorblind too. Edit: the wildest thing about the couch thing is someone suggested her to use the "be my eyes" app to check the color of the couch and she reveals she is already a helper on the app.

76
@IndigoEuphonium 2025-06-23

I said this long ago on a moistcritical video, but people that over rely on AI don't think Once had an office game where we would guess how much candy was in the jar for Halloween and some guy used AI to determine this tiny jar had 4000 pieces of candy. Didn't even think about the answer, just blindly submitted that as their answer. For a small jar that clearly could not contain 4000 pieces of any candy, not even Skittles

24 1 replies
@walkerpierce5446 2025-09-22

I think the reason why Wikipedia wasn't allowed is because it isn't a verified source. It's just the information. Being accurate and correct does not equal verified. It isn't the primary source of the peer reviewed study.

11

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot