Navigate Select ESC Close

Trump BLINDSIDED as DEVASTATING LEAK Surfaces

2025-10-10 People & Blogs
65.3k
5.6k
548
Legal AF
Legal AF
1.1m subscribers

Trump's Secretive NSPM-7 Weaponizes Federal Agencies Against Political Dissent

This directive weaponizes federal law enforcement to investigate citizens based on political beliefs, potentially violating First Amendment protections for groups and individuals. Understand the risks associated with National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7) and why major law firms are sounding the alarm.

Short Summary

  • Directs DOJ, FBI, and IRS to target organizations based on subjective political viewpoints (e.g., anti-Christian, anti-capitalist).
  • Lawyers warn that constitutionally protected speech and association may now trigger criminal investigation and loss of tax-exempt status.
  • This directive operates unlike conventional Executive Orders, often flying under media radar despite carrying sweeping policy weight for intelligence operations.

The discussion exposes National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7), a directive giving federal agencies broad authority to investigate and disrupt groups based on stated political beliefs defined as contrary to "traditional American values." Reviewing the specific criteria used for targeting may help you assess potential risks to your organization or association.

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

Attorneys Brian Kabateck and Shant Karnikian expose how Trump quietly issued National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7), a sweeping directive that weaponizes federal law enforcement to investigate and disrupt Americans based on their political beliefs rather than criminal actions. The hosts reveal how this presidential decree—issued with little publicity unlike traditional executive orders—directs the Justice Department, FBI, and IRS to target individuals and tax-exempt organizations exhibiting what Trump defines as "indicia of political violence," including holding views described as anti-Christian, anti-capitalist, anti-American, or having positions on migration, race, and gender that conflict with "traditional American values." They warn that major law firms, such as Arnold & Porter, are advising clients that activities historically protected by the First Amendment may now be subject to criminal prosecution. The directive makes clear that the DOJ intends to strip tax-exempt status and prosecute organizations and their funders for constitutionally protected speech. Kabateck LLP: Call 1-844-74-CIVIL for a free case evaluation or visit us at https://www.kbklawyers.com/ Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalAFMTN?sub_confirmation=1 Legal AF Substack: https://substack.com/@legalaf Follow Legal AF on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/legalafmtn.bsky.social Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/mspopok.bsky.social Subscribe to the Legal AF by MeidasTouch podcast here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-af-by-meidastouch/id1580828595

Top Comments (10)

@marias420 2025-10-10

Mainstream media didn’t pick it up on purpose. They’re cowards

175 6 replies
@dougspurr120 2025-10-10

Once more, there is no ANTIFA!!! Anyone who is anti-fascist is ANTIFA!!! The whole country was ANTIFA in WWII!! I consider myself ANTIFA and I’m against political violence!!!

159 11 replies
@earthrider700 2025-10-10

This is America, our America. We have a constitution and we are free of prosecution for our beliefs. I will not bow to a would-be dictator. I'm not alone either.

145 5 replies
@RubenGutierrez-s8v 2025-10-10

He's violating the US Constitution!

122 11 replies
@physicaltherapyhomeexercis1042 2025-10-10

Antifa is anti fascist . My understanding of the word is that if you are antifascist, you are against fascism. What the hell is wrong about being anti fascist? Nothing is wrong with being Antifa. I am not pro violence. I am against fascist like behavior that is being exhibited by ICE on Americans and immigrants.

122 4 replies
@alexchrss 2025-10-10

Do the same thing back. The governors of blue states should be charging Trump with crimes right back.

88 10 replies
@Trapper50cal 2025-10-10

NAKEDLY unconstitutional, transparently fascist, illegal, unethical. This is obvious authoritarian playbook and NO Judge or Justice can reasonably condone it ON IT'S FACE. It shouldn't be allowed to continue even another day.

83 1 replies
@Jimmyb0077 2025-10-10

This American Disabled Veteran is 100% 💯 Antifa and proud of it.

62 1 replies
@Henely5 2025-10-10

In WWII we were fighting fascism.

49
@FreedomLives326 2025-10-10

This is serious and how Trump can criminalize anyone he disagrees with!

31

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot