Navigate Select ESC Close

Is Free Will WRITTEN Within the Laws of Quantum Physics?

2024-06-07 Science & Technology
67.8k
3.6k
1.1k
Arvin Ash
Arvin Ash
1.1m subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

Want to restore the planet's ecosystems and see your impact in monthly videos? The first 500 people to join Planet Wild with my code ARVIN6 will get the first month for free at https://planetwild.com/r/arvinash/join If you want to get to know them better first, check out their fascinating YouTube video about a revolutionary approach to whale protection https://planetwild.com/r/arvinash/m14 SUPPORT ME ON PATREON https://www.patreon.com/arvinash BACKGROUND VIDEOS Pilot wave theory: https://youtu.be/eNJFUo7yHhQ Determinism & Heisenberg uncertainty: https://youtu.be/EyvZ8F3qLx8 CHAPTERS 0:00 No free will was status quo 2:28 Free will defined 3:33 What indeterminism in Quantum mechanics means 6:05 Do we have control over quantum outcomes? 6:56 An argument for free will 8:23 Why Deterministic or indeterministic laws make no difference 9:03 Does no free will absolve us of our responsitiblity 10:12 Compatibilism 11:26 Planet Wild is for you if you want to take action SUMMARY The simplest definition of free will is the ability to have made a different choice. Our more precise definition: it is the ability of conscious beings to make choices that are not solely determined by prior physical causes. Since Newton, we had thought that we could predict the outcome of every particle interaction if we had full knowledge of all the physical variables. So that meant the universe must be deterministic. But in the 20th century, quantum mechanics more precisely predicted behavior of particles at the smallest scales, but it predicts only probabilities. According to it, particles like electrons don't have specific positions, speeds, or paths until they are measured. Instead, they exist in a superposition, a kind of coexistence of all possible states, until the moment they interact with something. This is also called a measurement. For example, we can only ascertain the probability of finding an electron in any particular location, until the moment we measure it. Only then, do we know for certain where it is. So the result of a quantum interaction is indeterministic. Does this indeterminacy save free will? Suppose we could wind the clock back to make a different decision, while keeping everything the same. In other words, all the quantum states and other microscopic details would need to be identical. In a classical deterministic universe, the outcome would be exactly the same. The choice would be determined from its initial state. So in such a universe, there is no such thing as having made a different choice. But with quantum mechanics, there is randomness, because different outcomes can occur from the same initial conditions. In QM, we cannot predict ahead of time the outcome of any interaction based on its initial conditions. The result of an interaction, which we sometimes label as measurement, or observation ,will be random. But is this free will because given the same initial state, there could have been a different outcome? Just because there can be a different outcome, doesn’t mean that we manifested that outcome. It doesn't mean free will. It just means that some properties of elementary particles turned out to be different with the same initial state. The idea of making a decision is not part of the fundamental laws of physics. Making decisions is an emergent phenomenon that is due to the various electrical and chemical interactions and processes taking place in our brain. And these are due to a lot of different factors. It is something we experience only at human-scales not at a fundamental level. Decisions are classical events, not quantum ones. But if decisions are controlled by the firing of neurons, then according to quantum mechanics there would be some scenarios in which my neurons could fire in low probability unexpected ways, and that could result in my having made a different decision. So even though a certain decision might have a one in a billion chance of occurring, it is still possible. Since I made a different choice that was unexpected, isn’t that free will? While your neurons could fire in unexpected ways free will is the idea that you have control over your decisions, that you could have made a different choice deliberately and consciously. Quantum mechanics has an element of randomness, but this randomness cannot be controlled by you. #freewill Your thoughts and decisions do not play a role in the outcome of quantum interactions. So this randomness really does not save free will. If free will is the ability of conscious beings to make choices that are not solely determined by prior physical causes, I think we have to conclude that we don’t have such an ability. Quantum mechanics really should not affect your stance on free will. But we are making conscious decisions based on a thought process that is our own and no one else’s. So we are not absolved of our responsibility. No one is pulling the strings. We don’t have the right to say that any action we take is not our own.

Top Comments (10)

@hagbardceline9866 2024-06-07

I see a new Arvin Ash video and i must click it. It's like i have no free will.

157 5 replies
@binbots 2024-06-07

The indeterminism of QM is based on where one observes it in time. Because causality has a speed limit (c) every point in space where one observes it from will be the closest to the present moment. When one looks out into the universe they see the past which is made of particles (GR). When one tries to measure the position of a particle they are observing smaller distances and getting closer to the present moment (QM). The wave property of particles appears when we start trying to predict the future of that particle. A particle that has not had an interaction exists in a future state. It is a probability wave because the future is probabilistic. Wave function collapse is what we perceive as the present moment and is what divides the past from the future. GR is making measurements in the observed past and therefore, predictable. It can predict the future but only from information collected from the past. QM is attempting to make measurements of the unobserved future and therefore, unpredictable. Only once a particle interacts with the present moment does it become predictable. This is an observational interpretation of the mathematics we currently use based on the limited perspective we have with the experiments we choose to observe the universe with.

126 77 replies
@velisvideos6208 2024-06-07

Me: There is no free will. Therefore I am having another beer. Wife: No, you will not. Conclusion: There definitely isn't any free will.

23 1 replies
@johnniefujita 2024-06-10

This laplace quote is what made me fall in love with physics

8 1 replies
@mekingtiger9095 2024-06-07

I guess it depends on how you define "Free Will". I've seen people calling it "Random Will". But it certainly at the very least disproves hard determinism as we once believed in the past. Pretty basic opinion, I know, but still my tidbit.

7
@KeithCooper-Albuquerque 2024-06-07

Great video, Arvin!

4
@valdisvi 2024-06-11

As far as I can tell for myself, any carefully made decision of my "free will" is not much distinguishable from random choice based on fluctuations of my mood and feelings. Of course, I do "rationalization" of my choice afterwards.

3
@dhouggy 2024-06-09

Very interesting and well explained. Thisi s a fascinating area, more on consciousness!

0
@SzTz100 2024-06-07

What a great title and interesting question.

0
@ofontela 2024-07-03

@8:55 "The Laws of Physics which are immutable" 😂 good one!

0

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot