Is Gravity the Hidden Key to Quantum Physics?
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
The Hardest Questions in Physics | World Science Festival
World Science Festival
24.5k views
Greatest Mysteries of Gravity | Brian Greene & Kip Thorne
World Science Festival
29.8k views
Have We Been Brainwashed? Quantum Mechanics and Nonlocality
World Science Festival
32.7k views
When Physics Meets Fiction | Brian Greene & Dan Brown
World Science Festival
106.7k views
The Quantum Frontier with Brian Greene and John Preskill
World Science Festival
114.5k views
What We've Gotten Wrong About Quantum Physics
World Science Festival
224.5k views
Is Dark Matter the Wrong Idea?
World Science Festival
207.3k views
Black Holes and Quantum Gravity
World Science Festival
217.3k views
Quantum Quandaries: When Philosophy Drives Physics
World Science Festival
175.8k views
Is the Cosmos a Vast Computation?
World Science Festival
119.7k views
Top Comments (10)
Brian Greene is the single most suitable person as a host for this format
Brian is such a great interviewer in the sense he asks guests to explain topics for all audience members.
I like this format that assumes people have learned at least the very basics what's the topics being discussed and doesn't rehash the same thing over and over at a third grade level
I hope I live long enough to see quantum theory and general relativity resolved by some unified theory. If not I hope we discover something new and very interesting.
Greene is an exceptionally skilled interviewer and on another level when compared to everyone else.
When I was like 16 I remember reading your "The Elegant Universe" and since then I've been fascinated about physics. It's incredible that now I can watch these fabulous interviews and panels on the internet, something that would've never been shown on TV back then.
I've watched so many of these and read about quantum mechanics for many years. Not in a deep study type of way or anything. But I do find it fascinating that every time you get to the stage of asking "what would you say to someone who say that the probabilities is us just missing information", the answers are never very fulfilling to me. It still feels like the same classical "we just know" type of answer that has happened with scientific educators in the past and up until now. I'm not saying the world has to be definite in its outcomes, although it might and therefor free will cannot exist, but I digress. But I'm also not betting on our quantum probability calculations to be as good as they can be. Which would mean, lacking information of a system. I guess I just find it a bit arrogant to think you know that there's no more information to be gained in that realm. As that's basically what you'd have to do when claiming "it just is that way".
what a time to be alive to be able to listen to two geniuses like this
My favourite comment so far is "You can not Quantiized gravity." I mean, technically that's true.
Raphael Bousso's explanations really cleared some of the confusions I've had for a long time.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Brian Greene is the single most suitable person as a host for this format
Brian is such a great interviewer in the sense he asks guests to explain topics for all audience members.
I like this format that assumes people have learned at least the very basics what's the topics being discussed and doesn't rehash the same thing over and over at a third grade level
I hope I live long enough to see quantum theory and general relativity resolved by some unified theory. If not I hope we discover something new and very interesting.
Greene is an exceptionally skilled interviewer and on another level when compared to everyone else.
When I was like 16 I remember reading your "The Elegant Universe" and since then I've been fascinated about physics. It's incredible that now I can watch these fabulous interviews and panels on the internet, something that would've never been shown on TV back then.
I've watched so many of these and read about quantum mechanics for many years. Not in a deep study type of way or anything. But I do find it fascinating that every time you get to the stage of asking "what would you say to someone who say that the probabilities is us just missing information", the answers are never very fulfilling to me. It still feels like the same classical "we just know" type of answer that has happened with scientific educators in the past and up until now. I'm not saying the world has to be definite in its outcomes, although it might and therefor free will cannot exist, but I digress. But I'm also not betting on our quantum probability calculations to be as good as they can be. Which would mean, lacking information of a system. I guess I just find it a bit arrogant to think you know that there's no more information to be gained in that realm. As that's basically what you'd have to do when claiming "it just is that way".
what a time to be alive to be able to listen to two geniuses like this
My favourite comment so far is "You can not Quantiized gravity." I mean, technically that's true.
Raphael Bousso's explanations really cleared some of the confusions I've had for a long time.