Meta's new Llama-4 is Full of Controversies...
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Lindsey Graham's Death, New Iran Strikes & Mamdani's Map Controversy | PBD Podcast #831
PBD Podcast
246.9k views
Fox News in FULL COLLAPSE over TRUMP SURRENDER!!!
MeidasTouch
666.0k views
Google's TurboQuant Is Way Too Overhyped
bycloud
20.2k views
Kimi K2.5 Brought Us 3 brand NEW LLM Frontier!?
bycloud
22.6k views
Chinese DoorDash Is Making Better LLMs Than Meta
bycloud
22.8k views
‘He’s a fraud’: Democrats are ‘turning on’ Tampon Tim amid mounting controversies
Sky News Australia
79.7k views
Michelle Obama's INSANE Hair Controversy
Ben Shapiro
48.3k views
"America Only" Should Not Be Controversial, So Why Is It? | Ep. 1692
Matt Walsh
90.5k views
Michelle Obama's New Book Tour is Full of Racial Complaining and Her Hair, with Walter Kirn
Megyn Kelly
168.6k views
FUTURE HALL OF FAMER ZACK MARTIN, NBA GAMBLING CONTROVERSY + CARSON WENTZ IS BAD
Pardon My Take
156.2k views
Top Comments (10)
Fireship's video about llama 4 was so disappointing, lazy, and half of it was an ad. I'm starting to like bycloud a lot more, he really does go in-depth and explains things better. (Although he should stop using outdated memes 😭)
"Since it's open source everyone can fix it" > illegal to use in the EU
As much as I like the fact that a big company keeps supporting the open source llm landscape, I just gotta be honest that I've never been impressed with the llama models. They're bloated and just never performed well for anything I tried on them. And now they've gotten so fkin huge that if you manage to get them to run at all, you'll def be able to run smth like deepseek comfortably as well and I'd rather use that.
It feels like there's a secret sauce to make models better at coding. I have a small piece of JavaScript (originally created by an older LLM and faulty), that I use to measure LLM bug fix performance. There have been a lot of open weight models since around beginning last year, that manage to create the fixed code just fine, but they're usually 8B or above and not fully open source. I even tested some 12B-14B reasoning models and they mostly failed spectacularly after thousands of tokens. Either these models have never seen a piece of JavaScript, are overtrained on Python or there is a secret training set, the open source community doesn't have.
thank you for briefly explaining the difference between dense and moe as well as active parameters. from all these ai channels, i think you might be the best one. love your content and explainations!
Llama-4 is already asking for vacation days?
1.5B model outperforming 109B is funny
Visualize your AI content creation workflow now with poppy AI https://start.getpoppy.ai/bycloud and use the coupon code “BYCLOUD” for $25 off any plans!
We are not even on pinnacle of AI right now 🤯😭. We are cooked
You've been the best in AI news and overviews for years now and with great humor. glad I came across you
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Fireship's video about llama 4 was so disappointing, lazy, and half of it was an ad. I'm starting to like bycloud a lot more, he really does go in-depth and explains things better. (Although he should stop using outdated memes 😭)
"Since it's open source everyone can fix it" > illegal to use in the EU
As much as I like the fact that a big company keeps supporting the open source llm landscape, I just gotta be honest that I've never been impressed with the llama models. They're bloated and just never performed well for anything I tried on them. And now they've gotten so fkin huge that if you manage to get them to run at all, you'll def be able to run smth like deepseek comfortably as well and I'd rather use that.
It feels like there's a secret sauce to make models better at coding. I have a small piece of JavaScript (originally created by an older LLM and faulty), that I use to measure LLM bug fix performance. There have been a lot of open weight models since around beginning last year, that manage to create the fixed code just fine, but they're usually 8B or above and not fully open source. I even tested some 12B-14B reasoning models and they mostly failed spectacularly after thousands of tokens. Either these models have never seen a piece of JavaScript, are overtrained on Python or there is a secret training set, the open source community doesn't have.
thank you for briefly explaining the difference between dense and moe as well as active parameters. from all these ai channels, i think you might be the best one. love your content and explainations!
Llama-4 is already asking for vacation days?
1.5B model outperforming 109B is funny
Visualize your AI content creation workflow now with poppy AI https://start.getpoppy.ai/bycloud and use the coupon code “BYCLOUD” for $25 off any plans!
We are not even on pinnacle of AI right now 🤯😭. We are cooked
You've been the best in AI news and overviews for years now and with great humor. glad I came across you