The BEST Deep Research AI is ...
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
THIS IS THE BEST NEWS ALL YEAR
Timcast
87.9k views
GPT-5.2 is the best model ever made*
Theo - t3․gg
100.4k views
Is gpt-5.1 the best code model ever?
Theo - t3․gg
63.2k views
I Tested Every AI Image Editor. This is the Best
Futurepedia
100.7k views
The 5 Biggest Discoveries Revealed | The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch
HISTORY
462.9k views
Bones Discovered in Search for Wanted Dad Travis Decker
Law&Crime Network
263.4k views
The Most Anti-Inflammatory Diet Ever Discovered (Best Foods Revealed)
Thomas DeLauer
112.2k views
The Ocean Is Much Deeper Than We Thought | Creep Cast
CreepCast
1.1m views
The Truth about AI is Devastating: Proof by MIT, Harvard
Discover AI
65.2k views
The Opps' Discord is Imploding
Destiny
136.1k views
Top Comments (4)
GLM was heavily distilled from Claude, basically GLM has learned from Claude's mistakes, that is why the Min task% for GLM is higher 😄
I would add a fifth social-type dimension, to adapt the research output to the purpose of the human interlocutors
The only way for AI to self-improve before 2028 is if inferences in computer coding and mathematics lead to discoveries that improve the architecture of AI models. By implementing continuous learning and drawing on the various structures of the human psyche, AI will be caught in a self-sustaining improvement loop. (Deepmind, Yann LeCun...)
Looking at the paper, the minimum/maximum tasks measures don't appear to be the min and max range (variation) for a given task, but the best and worst performance across all 100 tasks which mixes or conflates capability and variation. ("Minimum task score and Maximum task score are the lowest and highest task-level scores for the model. ") However, variance (e.g. as a histogram) per model-task would be a great to know!
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (4)
GLM was heavily distilled from Claude, basically GLM has learned from Claude's mistakes, that is why the Min task% for GLM is higher 😄
I would add a fifth social-type dimension, to adapt the research output to the purpose of the human interlocutors
The only way for AI to self-improve before 2028 is if inferences in computer coding and mathematics lead to discoveries that improve the architecture of AI models. By implementing continuous learning and drawing on the various structures of the human psyche, AI will be caught in a self-sustaining improvement loop. (Deepmind, Yann LeCun...)
Looking at the paper, the minimum/maximum tasks measures don't appear to be the min and max range (variation) for a given task, but the best and worst performance across all 100 tasks which mixes or conflates capability and variation. ("Minimum task score and Maximum task score are the lowest and highest task-level scores for the model. ") However, variance (e.g. as a histogram) per model-task would be a great to know!