Navigate Select ESC Close

The Truth about AI is Devastating: Proof by MIT, Harvard

2025-07-12 Science & Technology
65.2k
2.3k
806
Discover AI
Discover AI
88.5k subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

AI Superintelligence? ASI with the new LLMs like GPT5, Gemini 3 or newly released Grok4? Forget about it! GROK4 will discover new Physics? Dream on. Harvard Univ and MIT provide new evidence of the internal thoughts and world models of every AI architecture from Transformer, to RNN to LSTM to Mamba and Mamba 2. LLMs are Just Faking It: New Proof by MIT, Harvard. Harvard & MIT's New Proof: LLMs Aren't Intelligent. Just pattern matching machines. The truth about AI is devastating. And provides long and fascinating research trajectories into our future with AI. @harvard @mit @OpenAI @googledeepmind all rights w/ authors: What Has a Foundation Model Found? Using Inductive Bias to Probe for World Models Keyon Vafa 1 Peter G. Chang 2 Ashesh Rambachan 2 Sendhil Mullainathan 2 from 1 Harvard Univ 2 MIT #harvard #emergence #agi #superintelligence #massachusettsinstituteoftechnology #aiexplained #ailearning #grok4

Top Comments (10)

@gravitywell-75 2025-07-13

I think anyone who has used LLMs for anything substantial will have realized that they do not actually understand anything. This doesn't mean they are not useful tools, but those expecting AGI are going to have to wait a while longer.

346 38 replies
@eafadeev 2025-07-12

They forgot to put into the prompt: "you are the world leading expert in physics, like Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler..."

281 24 replies
@dankprole7884 2025-07-12

Turns out llms work exactly like other ML models 😂

204 27 replies
@darth_dan8886 2025-07-14

This actually points to a deeper misconception in the field of AI development. The idea that a _language_ model would be conducive to _thinking._ I feel like a lot of people mistakenly conflate the process of thinking with the process of expressing the thoughts. A chimp that can throw a rock at a target already intuitively understands Newtonian physics. We need not a _language_ model, but a _thought_ model.

122 28 replies
@andrewcampbell7011 2025-07-12

It’s not a formalized experiment with inductive bias controls, but I have noticed that when I push co-coding models into really weird use cases, they completely breakdown, like even forgetting syntax. This tells me they cannot extrapolate, only pattern match. In fact, they don’t even have a model of the language syntax.

96 12 replies
@Jvo_Rien 2025-07-12

Thanks for sharing. According to a recent Anthropic paper, LLMs employ parallel processing and heuristic-based shortcuts to come with believable answers, particularly in mathematical tasks, without truly grasping the fundamental ideas—that is, without putting the human-crafted techniques they acquired from the training dataset to use. They seem to be very good at anticipating "what," but not so much "why."

89 15 replies
@3dus 2025-07-12

Well… Apple DID try to warn us of this.

44 3 replies
@bigchristianhope 2025-07-16

There is a lot of magical thinking around AI

31 2 replies
@opa-age 2025-07-15

No matter how many cards you add to a card catalog, in the end it's still a card catalog.

31
@BradleyKieser 2025-07-15

This is the same for coding it is very clear that even the most state of the art models do not actually fundamentally understand what's happening with the variables and control structures within the code they are merely piecing together various patterns.

16

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot