Princeton Scientist: We Don't Understand AI
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Understand & Improve Memory Using Science-Based Tools | Huberman Lab Essentials
Andrew Huberman
18.3k views
Understanding America's Goals in Iran, with Erik Prince and Mark Geist, & Clinton's Epstein Comments
Megyn Kelly
44.5k views
Avi Loeb: What Is 3I/ATLAS?
Dr Brian Keating
56.9k views
Does Avi Loeb Have PROOF of Alien Technology?
Dr Brian Keating
78.3k views
Essentials: Understanding & Treating Addiction | Dr. Anna Lembke
Andrew Huberman
221.6k views
Why People Are TERRIFIED Of Eric Weinstein’s Geometric Unity
Dr Brian Keating
164.4k views
Brian Keating on Losing the Nobel Prize & Origins of the Universe
StarTalk
303.2k views
The REAL reason why we haven't heard from aliens
Dr Brian Keating
93.1k views
Megyn Kelly Thinks I Don’t Understand Women, But Does She Understand Men?
Matt Walsh
383.3k views
How Do We Go Beyond Einstein? Eric Weinstein and Avi Loeb
Dr Brian Keating
107.2k views
Top Comments (10)
📌 Welcome! If you found this from another science channel, we’re glad you're here. Here are some good starting points: 🏆 Must Sees playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJGKdZD30K__XkD2TDGq1pQo8Q__6vBhB 🔬Origins of the Universe playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJGKdZD30K_8pkx_wLg5vQmkAvGTUNaNm 🎯Aliens, UFOs & Extraterrestrial Intelligence: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJGKdZD30K__D6oamWCq9uvSFKVoatsCf New episodes every Tuesday.
As an expert in this field, I've been shaking my head at the idiots spruiking AI for what seems decades, now. I am not sure people could get dumber, but then I see the investors. Who put the idiots in charge? voters, investors, the dumb and dumberer are running this world.
Great interview! I loved all parts, as consciousness as well as AI has my interest! This conversation is valuable because it shows how far we can go in modelling thought: deduction, induction, abduction, memory, pattern recognition and language. But that may also mark the boundary. *We model thinking, but we do not enter awareness!!* We describe the movements within mind, while awareness is the field in which those movements appear.
Based on the thumbnail title, I thought this was going to be about LLM mechanistic interpretability. Instead it is about how children think.
In moving from the physics dept to the psychology dept to investigate thought and consciousness they might just drop into the philosophy dept where they might make some alarming discoveries.
In his explanation of asking a human about flipping a coin I believe he touched on the very theory of what happens when something is observed versus when it is not.
I remember gifting his book as a Christmas gift. “Algorithms in the brain” I guess.
A large part of the confusion is that humans can do formal computation , but this is a very thin slice of what goes on in a human being. So trying to reduce the brain or consciousness to computation is looking through the wrong end of the telescope ...
Man, as a philosopher, I really wish the cognitive scientists would read us. "Family resemblance" is Wittgensteinian philosophy of language from more than a quarter century before Roach, and a lot of the questions being asked have been covered in philosophy (including certain answers to certain questions...)
Oh, I didn't realize that he wrote "algorithms to live by" as well. I really liked that one and I'll be tempted to pick this one up too.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
📌 Welcome! If you found this from another science channel, we’re glad you're here. Here are some good starting points: 🏆 Must Sees playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJGKdZD30K__XkD2TDGq1pQo8Q__6vBhB 🔬Origins of the Universe playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJGKdZD30K_8pkx_wLg5vQmkAvGTUNaNm 🎯Aliens, UFOs & Extraterrestrial Intelligence: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJGKdZD30K__D6oamWCq9uvSFKVoatsCf New episodes every Tuesday.
As an expert in this field, I've been shaking my head at the idiots spruiking AI for what seems decades, now. I am not sure people could get dumber, but then I see the investors. Who put the idiots in charge? voters, investors, the dumb and dumberer are running this world.
Great interview! I loved all parts, as consciousness as well as AI has my interest! This conversation is valuable because it shows how far we can go in modelling thought: deduction, induction, abduction, memory, pattern recognition and language. But that may also mark the boundary. *We model thinking, but we do not enter awareness!!* We describe the movements within mind, while awareness is the field in which those movements appear.
Based on the thumbnail title, I thought this was going to be about LLM mechanistic interpretability. Instead it is about how children think.
In moving from the physics dept to the psychology dept to investigate thought and consciousness they might just drop into the philosophy dept where they might make some alarming discoveries.
In his explanation of asking a human about flipping a coin I believe he touched on the very theory of what happens when something is observed versus when it is not.
I remember gifting his book as a Christmas gift. “Algorithms in the brain” I guess.
A large part of the confusion is that humans can do formal computation , but this is a very thin slice of what goes on in a human being. So trying to reduce the brain or consciousness to computation is looking through the wrong end of the telescope ...
Man, as a philosopher, I really wish the cognitive scientists would read us. "Family resemblance" is Wittgensteinian philosophy of language from more than a quarter century before Roach, and a lot of the questions being asked have been covered in philosophy (including certain answers to certain questions...)
Oh, I didn't realize that he wrote "algorithms to live by" as well. I really liked that one and I'll be tempted to pick this one up too.