Coffee & Cursey Words | Jen Shah Guilty. Depp v Heard | Depp's Response to Juror 15 Nonsense!

what’s the difference between water and Amber Heard? water makes up the majority of the human body while Amber makes up everything.

The two gentlemen were father and son, living at the same address WITH THE SAME FIRST AND LAST NAMES. The father was 77. VIRGINIA EXCUSES ANYONE OVER THE AGE OF 70 FROM SERVING ON JURY DUTY therefore, when the summons was received, it was REASONABLE fpr the son to assume that the summons was meant for him. Both Elaine and Heard knew that the insurance companies were paying Elaine's legal fees. Elaine BILLED the insurance companies and WAS RECEIVING REGULAR PAYMENTS from the company. BOTH Elaine and Heard LIED to the jury when stating that Heard had paid $6 milllion in legal fees. Elaine should be sanctioned for lying to the jury and Heard should be charged with perjury.

My boyfriend made a good point last night when I was filling him in on the "juror 15" motion for mistrial. And reminded me that when called for jury duty, the potential jurors don't know at first what trial they are being vetted for. So the idea that the son intentionally showed up for jury duty to decide on the depp/Heard case is just wrong

When Emily said "This case just doesn't end!" I was thinking "This is AH giving the world a little taste of what it feels like to be in a relationship with her". It reminded me of when Depp said that arguing with her was like going around and around in a circle. And Issac B said something similar about the argument he was present for also. The longer she goes on the more my sympathy for Depp grows.

1:10:31 Juror 15 is indeed 77 years of age, his skincare routine consists of the same products Amber Herd uses to cover her nonexistent bruises, your honor.

Many of us viewers recall watching and listening to Amber Heard stating on the witness stand at the end of the trial, that she did WRITE the Op-Ed and it WAS ABOUT JOHNNY DEPP. Therefore, there is no longer an "innuendo issue".

"Could the court inquire about the birthday or the skin care routine " you killed me with that one 🤣

The media also seems to have forgotten the fact that Amber Heard said twice on the stand that the article was about Johnny Depp. One was "I didn't write it JUST about Johnny" and the other "The reason I wrote this was" and then went on to say she wrote it about Johnny Depp getting protected by others.

So is it name calling to quote Runkle saying Elaine acted as a "Malicious Law Squirrel" putting the nut aside (Juror 15) for future use? 🤣🤣

Honestly, I appreciate Heard’s BS that brought Ben Chew and team into my life. Who knew court filings could be so shady, informative, entertaining and factual. “Unknown to the law” 🤣🤣