Depp v. Heard Appeal and Amicus Brief Response | Lawyer Reacts
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
LIVE Depp v. Heard The Sidebars. Closing and Rebuttal Witnesses
Emily D. Baker
251.1k views
LIVE Lawyer Reacts. Alex Murdaugh New Trial Motion, Press Conference and Response.
Emily D. Baker
237.5k views
Lawyer Reacts Depp v. Heard. Netflix & The Insurance Lawsuits. The Emily Show Ep. 211
Emily D. Baker
311.2k views
LIVE Lawyer Reacts Bryan Kohberger Idaho Court Hearings
Emily D. Baker
165.0k views
Tom Girardi State Bar Scandal! Lawyer Reacts Live
Emily D. Baker
179.4k views
Amber Heard Settles! Is Depp v. Heard Over?? Lawyer Reacts.
Emily D. Baker
349.6k views
Amber Heard Responds to Johnny Depp | TikTok Sued! | Lawyer Reacts
Emily D. Baker
266.5k views
Erika Girardi Scandal Earring Appeal. TikTok Sued! Lawyer Reacts
Emily D. Baker
114.7k views
Amber Heard Stateless? Can She Be Sued? Lawyer Reacts
Emily D. Baker
216.5k views
Lawyer Reacts Live | Johnny Depp Files Appeal!
Emily D. Baker
314.4k views
Top Comments (10)
I’m so sick of AH’s gaslighting! The audacity of her thinking that she can gaslight the court system & victims!! 😡🤬😡🤬
“The devastating effects of this verdict” what, that men can and are abused also and just believing women without proof is a bad idea? As a survivor of DV, that makes me sick!
I feel like Rottenborn's tactic in this is to break everyone's brain. To follow his arguments, you need a whiteboard with a timeline, pictures and colored arrows going all over the place.
i hate that the conclusion is mostly "if a woman reports abuse it must be considered truth, regardless as to if they are lying or not, because a bad verdict is bad for others". to me the verdict only went agaisnt those that lie about abuse
This really bothers me. It’s like these people totally disregarded the fact of AH admitting that she was hitting JD. She was the abuser
I love the fact that Rottenborn starts to eat his argument alive the longer he prattles along.
My 1st viewing of the amici just solidified my thoughts that it was strictly P.R. That and the fact that one of the alleged AH's biggest mouthpieces on twitter, received and shared it before it was submitted to court.
I have no idea why, but the invocation of "lawful law" reminded me to leave a comment and smash that like button. Brains are weird sometimes.
Rottenborn: There was no damage. But also there was, and Johnny did it.
Trust, but verify. Best words to live by. Trust the person, but verify facts before shouting from the rooftops.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I’m so sick of AH’s gaslighting! The audacity of her thinking that she can gaslight the court system & victims!! 😡🤬😡🤬
“The devastating effects of this verdict” what, that men can and are abused also and just believing women without proof is a bad idea? As a survivor of DV, that makes me sick!
I feel like Rottenborn's tactic in this is to break everyone's brain. To follow his arguments, you need a whiteboard with a timeline, pictures and colored arrows going all over the place.
i hate that the conclusion is mostly "if a woman reports abuse it must be considered truth, regardless as to if they are lying or not, because a bad verdict is bad for others". to me the verdict only went agaisnt those that lie about abuse
This really bothers me. It’s like these people totally disregarded the fact of AH admitting that she was hitting JD. She was the abuser
I love the fact that Rottenborn starts to eat his argument alive the longer he prattles along.
My 1st viewing of the amici just solidified my thoughts that it was strictly P.R. That and the fact that one of the alleged AH's biggest mouthpieces on twitter, received and shared it before it was submitted to court.
I have no idea why, but the invocation of "lawful law" reminded me to leave a comment and smash that like button. Brains are weird sometimes.
Rottenborn: There was no damage. But also there was, and Johnny did it.
Trust, but verify. Best words to live by. Trust the person, but verify facts before shouting from the rooftops.