Amber Heard Responds to Johnny Depp | TikTok Sued! | Lawyer Reacts
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Lawyer Reacts Depp v. Heard. Netflix & The Insurance Lawsuits. The Emily Show Ep. 211
Emily D. Baker
311.2k views
LIVE Lawyer Reacts Kohberger Hearing Part 2, the Lawyers Argue.
Emily D. Baker
138.2k views
LIVE | Lawyers Respond To ChatGPT Sanctions. ChatGPT Sued For Defamation?!?
Emily D. Baker
237.6k views
Amber Heard Settles! Is Depp v. Heard Over?? Lawyer Reacts.
Emily D. Baker
349.6k views
Tik Tok Banned? SBF Takes 1 Billion from FTX! | Lawyer Reacts
Emily D. Baker
123.0k views
Depp v. Heard Appeal and Amicus Brief Response | Lawyer Reacts
Emily D. Baker
415.1k views
Erika Girardi Scandal Earring Appeal. TikTok Sued! Lawyer Reacts
Emily D. Baker
114.7k views
Amber Heard Stateless? Can She Be Sued? Lawyer Reacts
Emily D. Baker
216.5k views
Lawyer Reacts Live | Johnny Depp Files Appeal!
Emily D. Baker
314.4k views
Lawyer Reacts | Amber Heard Homeless? First Look, Nate The Lawyer Sues for Defamation!
Emily D. Baker
389.4k views
Top Comments (10)
Gahhhhhh.. I cannot.. Believe.. Amber heard.. IS STILL... STILL trying to paint herself a victim. 😞😓 It's not only triggering.. but it is.. heart breaking. As a victim.. as a human.. it's so upsetting. 😣
The whole "malice" thing bothers me. Let's compare the two statements: Heard and her team (including whats-that-companys-name who wrote the OP basically for her) went to the moon and back out of their way to make the OP ed "delicately" obvious and at the same time "safe" for them to not get sued. That was shown in court! From the evidence we can assume that it was a lie. Hence malice. Waldman, on the other hand, saw what she was doing, speculated (with the evidence HE knew of) how the story went (the wine o. the wall, blah blah), and stated as much. How is that malice?
The reason why the texts don't mean anything to me is because I think of texts I've sent about people who have put me through immense amounts of pain and I completely get it. In the heat of the moment, you sometimes say messed up things. It's a lot different than say....cutting off someone's finger with a glass bottle.
Rottenborn not getting the 'other uses for your throat' will stay with me forever 😆
An awful lot of "didn't we go through this already?" in Rottenborn's filing. Did anyone else get the feeling that this was partly a fantasy redo of the trial if he had been lead council? I wonder if the ambiguous timeline was because he had originally set up a timeline based on Depp's interactions with Marilyn Manson, but at the last second decided that was pushing it.
What shocks me most about this case is that there were images of text messages between JD and his friend and the "in" and "out" were labelled in a way that JD was on the receiving end, but they used it in a way that meant JD was the one who said it. And no one ever talked about it again after we found out about it haha.
Don't forget the joy that was Rottenborn's ability to *turn on his microphone*. Man is that a low bar set by Elaine or what? 🤣🤣 Was he the one trying to make sexting sound like... not sexting? And third, he did give us Megapints.
There is zero way Johnny “destroyed” the pent house or spilled any wine because the police saw nothing. He was gone and didn’t come back. But it was magically there for a photo op. ? 🤔 the only people there was amber, rocky, Josh and the other friend. Other than the police… so Waldman would be correct. Right? Just that it wasn’t for the police but the photo op for court filings for the TRO I think
BTW Josh Drew, Rocky's ex fiance, told Waldman in a recorded deposition was a Hoax
As a university student, we were strictly barred from using wikipedia as a source. We could fail a whole essay for this one mistake/source. Never expected this from Mr. Rottenborne, as an intellectual and professional. It is a crime in academia!
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Gahhhhhh.. I cannot.. Believe.. Amber heard.. IS STILL... STILL trying to paint herself a victim. 😞😓 It's not only triggering.. but it is.. heart breaking. As a victim.. as a human.. it's so upsetting. 😣
The whole "malice" thing bothers me. Let's compare the two statements: Heard and her team (including whats-that-companys-name who wrote the OP basically for her) went to the moon and back out of their way to make the OP ed "delicately" obvious and at the same time "safe" for them to not get sued. That was shown in court! From the evidence we can assume that it was a lie. Hence malice. Waldman, on the other hand, saw what she was doing, speculated (with the evidence HE knew of) how the story went (the wine o. the wall, blah blah), and stated as much. How is that malice?
The reason why the texts don't mean anything to me is because I think of texts I've sent about people who have put me through immense amounts of pain and I completely get it. In the heat of the moment, you sometimes say messed up things. It's a lot different than say....cutting off someone's finger with a glass bottle.
Rottenborn not getting the 'other uses for your throat' will stay with me forever 😆
An awful lot of "didn't we go through this already?" in Rottenborn's filing. Did anyone else get the feeling that this was partly a fantasy redo of the trial if he had been lead council? I wonder if the ambiguous timeline was because he had originally set up a timeline based on Depp's interactions with Marilyn Manson, but at the last second decided that was pushing it.
What shocks me most about this case is that there were images of text messages between JD and his friend and the "in" and "out" were labelled in a way that JD was on the receiving end, but they used it in a way that meant JD was the one who said it. And no one ever talked about it again after we found out about it haha.
Don't forget the joy that was Rottenborn's ability to *turn on his microphone*. Man is that a low bar set by Elaine or what? 🤣🤣 Was he the one trying to make sexting sound like... not sexting? And third, he did give us Megapints.
There is zero way Johnny “destroyed” the pent house or spilled any wine because the police saw nothing. He was gone and didn’t come back. But it was magically there for a photo op. ? 🤔 the only people there was amber, rocky, Josh and the other friend. Other than the police… so Waldman would be correct. Right? Just that it wasn’t for the police but the photo op for court filings for the TRO I think
BTW Josh Drew, Rocky's ex fiance, told Waldman in a recorded deposition was a Hoax
As a university student, we were strictly barred from using wikipedia as a source. We could fail a whole essay for this one mistake/source. Never expected this from Mr. Rottenborne, as an intellectual and professional. It is a crime in academia!