Navigate Select ESC Close

Amber Heard Responds to Johnny Depp | TikTok Sued! | Lawyer Reacts

2022-12-08 Entertainment
266.5k
10.9k
568
Emily D. Baker
Emily D. Baker
865.0k subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

#JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard #johnnydeppvamberheard The Docket 00:00 Welcome 12:11 Quick Bits 12:22 Sunny Balwani 35:50 TikTok 52:05 Amber Heard Responds to Johnny Depp Resources https://www.law360.com/articles/1556204 **Connect with me** Email Me: [email protected] Join the community for exclusive content: https://www.LawNerdsUnite.com **Looking for MERCH! : https://www.LawNerdShop.com ** TEXT ME: https://www.TextEmily.com MAIL TIME: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin Tn 37067 **My Favorite YOUTUBE TOOL VidIQ https://vidiq.com/LawNerd WHAT I USE TO STREAM: https://www.emilydbaker.com/streamyard SHORTS & Clips? https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7pGyYaOMsJv1tlPNBgAG2Q My TedTalk → https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBXkN9sQELk Shop for makeup and support Emily at the same time! Visit our friends at Gerard Cosmetics → https://gerardcosmetics.com/?rfsn=5277986.4c1afa and use code LAWNERDS for 30% OFF Join me on Social @TheEmilyDBaker https://www.Instagram.com/TheEmilyDBaker https://www.Twitter.com/TheEmilyDBaker Follow My Cats on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fredandgeorge_cat/ Emily’s glasses lenses are Irlen tint https://www.irlen.com My coffee mug, streaming setup and the things I am loving right now! http://www.Amazon.com/shop/emilydbaker Hey! I have a podcast -- The Emily Show is on your favorite podcast player or here http://www.emilydbaker.com/podcast *This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. These videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise stated. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2022 Baker Media, LLC*

Top Comments (10)

@platitudestern5149 2022-12-08

Gahhhhhh.. I cannot.. Believe.. Amber heard.. IS STILL... STILL trying to paint herself a victim. 😞😓 It's not only triggering.. but it is.. heart breaking. As a victim.. as a human.. it's so upsetting. 😣

512 40 replies
@OriginalAivien 2022-12-08

The whole "malice" thing bothers me. Let's compare the two statements: Heard and her team (including whats-that-companys-name who wrote the OP basically for her) went to the moon and back out of their way to make the OP ed "delicately" obvious and at the same time "safe" for them to not get sued. That was shown in court! From the evidence we can assume that it was a lie. Hence malice. Waldman, on the other hand, saw what she was doing, speculated (with the evidence HE knew of) how the story went (the wine o. the wall, blah blah), and stated as much. How is that malice?

290 16 replies
@ohitsclemenTIME 2022-12-09

The reason why the texts don't mean anything to me is because I think of texts I've sent about people who have put me through immense amounts of pain and I completely get it. In the heat of the moment, you sometimes say messed up things. It's a lot different than say....cutting off someone's finger with a glass bottle.

98 6 replies
@kaneykane3449 2022-12-08

Rottenborn not getting the 'other uses for your throat' will stay with me forever 😆

82 4 replies
@jessejordache1869 2022-12-08

An awful lot of "didn't we go through this already?" in Rottenborn's filing. Did anyone else get the feeling that this was partly a fantasy redo of the trial if he had been lead council? I wonder if the ambiguous timeline was because he had originally set up a timeline based on Depp's interactions with Marilyn Manson, but at the last second decided that was pushing it.

67
@OtterCid 2022-12-09

What shocks me most about this case is that there were images of text messages between JD and his friend and the "in" and "out" were labelled in a way that JD was on the receiving end, but they used it in a way that meant JD was the one who said it. And no one ever talked about it again after we found out about it haha.

53 1 replies
@amylynnhunt55 2022-12-09

Don't forget the joy that was Rottenborn's ability to *turn on his microphone*. Man is that a low bar set by Elaine or what? 🤣🤣 Was he the one trying to make sexting sound like... not sexting? And third, he did give us Megapints.

15
@MoonDragon1 2022-12-09

There is zero way Johnny “destroyed” the pent house or spilled any wine because the police saw nothing. He was gone and didn’t come back. But it was magically there for a photo op. ? 🤔 the only people there was amber, rocky, Josh and the other friend. Other than the police… so Waldman would be correct. Right? Just that it wasn’t for the police but the photo op for court filings for the TRO I think

11
@joannegrieco8523 2022-12-09

BTW Josh Drew, Rocky's ex fiance, told Waldman in a recorded deposition was a Hoax

7
@merrilyaberry 2022-12-11

As a university student, we were strictly barred from using wikipedia as a source. We could fail a whole essay for this one mistake/source. Never expected this from Mr. Rottenborne, as an intellectual and professional. It is a crime in academia!

3

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot