AI Outlawed ☠️ in Open Source Project
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Mythos unleashed on Opensource
The PrimeTime
331.6k views
"I suck" -ThePrimeagen
The PrimeTime
55.8k views
Open Source might change forever
The PrimeTime
68.2k views
OpenAI's New Era
The PrimeTime
217.3k views
I Read Honey's Source Code
The PrimeTime
172.9k views
Is Google expecting too much of opensource
ThePrimeTime
63.9k views
OpenAI Is A Ponzi Scheme
ThePrimeTime
86.7k views
AI Coding Sucks | Prime Reacts
ThePrimeTime
245.8k views
Tailwind Creator on the Challenges of Open Source | The Standup
ThePrimeTime
81.2k views
Giving in to the AI Hype
ThePrimeTime
201.9k views
Top Comments (10)
QEMU is actually a really important virtualization software
"so-called" is not referring to the "code generators" part of "AI code generators" it's referring to the "so-called AI".
I believe it is a correct move. The policy won't stop people from actuallly using said tools. That is not the point. However the project is legally protected from any litigious individual that decides that because they have written the same line of code before, that means the project has definitely stolen it from him. It is not going to change anything in practice (aside from getting rid of some blatant "As a large language model" style contributions).
I like the guy who just confidently stated that the copyright issue had already been resolved. I'm sure that'll be a big relief for many.
The fact that AI code is not copyrightable under current rules is super important. You can sit there and smugly attack a project for taking a hard line on this, but if coders using llms end up making open source projects uncopyrightable, then they end up effectively eliminating the enforceability of the open source license. It isn't about whether AI is a useful tool or not. It is about whether a single bad actor can effectively steal a project from its original authors. The same concern potentially applies commercial works created using AI as well. In that sense, a lot of people are playing dice with the devil.
for those who don't know, qemu was made by the guy who made ffmpeg
I think we're eventually going to have to come to terms with the ownership of ideas being a silly idea.
AI will end copyright soon, so this discussion is just a history.
QEMU is a huge part of running VMs on Linux so it's good to see they want to avoid shit code getting added
"Viralling opensourceness" is one of the phrases of all time.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
QEMU is actually a really important virtualization software
"so-called" is not referring to the "code generators" part of "AI code generators" it's referring to the "so-called AI".
I believe it is a correct move. The policy won't stop people from actuallly using said tools. That is not the point. However the project is legally protected from any litigious individual that decides that because they have written the same line of code before, that means the project has definitely stolen it from him. It is not going to change anything in practice (aside from getting rid of some blatant "As a large language model" style contributions).
I like the guy who just confidently stated that the copyright issue had already been resolved. I'm sure that'll be a big relief for many.
The fact that AI code is not copyrightable under current rules is super important. You can sit there and smugly attack a project for taking a hard line on this, but if coders using llms end up making open source projects uncopyrightable, then they end up effectively eliminating the enforceability of the open source license. It isn't about whether AI is a useful tool or not. It is about whether a single bad actor can effectively steal a project from its original authors. The same concern potentially applies commercial works created using AI as well. In that sense, a lot of people are playing dice with the devil.
for those who don't know, qemu was made by the guy who made ffmpeg
I think we're eventually going to have to come to terms with the ownership of ideas being a silly idea.
AI will end copyright soon, so this discussion is just a history.
QEMU is a huge part of running VMs on Linux so it's good to see they want to avoid shit code getting added
"Viralling opensourceness" is one of the phrases of all time.