Claude 4 Opus is the MOST DANGEROUS Model | INSANE Coding and ML Abilities
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Claude Opus 4.8 Is Too Smart… and TOO HONEST
Wes Roth
53.4k views
Hermes Agent is INSANE...
Wes Roth
37.3k views
Claude just unlocked the SHOGGOTH...
Wes Roth
56.6k views
Claude just BROKE the ENTIRE INDUSTRY...
Wes Roth
53.0k views
the end of Claude Code
Wes Roth
25.3k views
OPUS 4.6 is a bit "TOO SMART"
Wes Roth
37.8k views
Opus 4.6 Is The Best Coding Model Ever Made*
Theo - t3․gg
106.6k views
Opus 4.6 is about to send SHOCKWAVES...
Wes Roth
52.1k views
GROK 4.20 cracked the code
Wes Roth
45.0k views
Claude Code is about to break everything
Wes Roth
51.1k views
Top Comments (10)
Anthropic hyping up their models. “Our models aren’t lagging behind everybody else, they’re actually dangerous!”
Seems like marketing. Like diet pill ads that say "warning, these pills are for SERIOUS weight loss only!"
Here before Claude 3 is fixed
did the title say Claude 3 this whole time? 🤦
here before he changes the title to 'claude 4 is shocking'
Sam Altman said the same thing. Turned out it was only for marketing
Blue Player 3 found a bug — he’s scoring on his own goal (red got 172 points), getting exp for his level but at the cost of his team winning. Also, red was trying to do that too, but Blue Player 1 kept stealing the ball and passing back to Blue Player 3, so they were both getting skills at the cost of losing the game.
From my experience once the chat gets longer starts to loose the smartness. I tried it in API to develop three.js scenes, follow-up prompts will immediately break the working parts of the code once the chat go longer! At least in my experience, but still overall is very great for short chats.
4 sonnet tried to get me to run cli ‘echo “explain the thing we wanted to do”’ like 3 times today
I paid for claude pro and then literally an hour later they launched the upgrade. I had no idea but it was a pleasant surprise
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Anthropic hyping up their models. “Our models aren’t lagging behind everybody else, they’re actually dangerous!”
Seems like marketing. Like diet pill ads that say "warning, these pills are for SERIOUS weight loss only!"
Here before Claude 3 is fixed
did the title say Claude 3 this whole time? 🤦
here before he changes the title to 'claude 4 is shocking'
Sam Altman said the same thing. Turned out it was only for marketing
Blue Player 3 found a bug — he’s scoring on his own goal (red got 172 points), getting exp for his level but at the cost of his team winning. Also, red was trying to do that too, but Blue Player 1 kept stealing the ball and passing back to Blue Player 3, so they were both getting skills at the cost of losing the game.
From my experience once the chat gets longer starts to loose the smartness. I tried it in API to develop three.js scenes, follow-up prompts will immediately break the working parts of the code once the chat go longer! At least in my experience, but still overall is very great for short chats.
4 sonnet tried to get me to run cli ‘echo “explain the thing we wanted to do”’ like 3 times today
I paid for claude pro and then literally an hour later they launched the upgrade. I had no idea but it was a pleasant surprise