Navigate Select ESC Close

Open 32B w/ AutoMemory beats Opus: HOW? (Stanford)

2026-07-04 Science & Technology
3.6k
156
13
Discover AI
Discover AI
90.5k subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

AN open-source AI model, QWEN 32B, can achieve similar performance like Gemini 3 or Opus from Anthropic with an optimized memory management. New algorithms and insights from Stanford Univ. All rights w/ authors: "AUTOMEM: Automated Learning of Memory as a Cognitive Skill" by Shengguang Wu Hao Zhu Yuhui Zhang Xiaohan Wang Serena Yeung-Levy from Stanford University arXiv:2607.01224 1 July, 2026 #airesearch #nextgenai #localai #futureai #futuretech

Top Comments (10)

@ReshuffleTheDeck 2026-07-04

Interesting, useful, but we need methods that are not dependent on frontier models

10 3 replies
@perrybirch 2026-07-04

It’s a bit uncanny how often your videos feel like they are crawling my recent agent logs to explain and expand the exact thing I’m working on at the time. 😂

2 2 replies
@stevesmith4600 2026-07-04

So rather than just using Claude, I can now use Claude and Qwen and distill Claude knowledge into a LoRA for Qwen, and then I basically get near the same intelligence as Claude, provided that I keep interacting with the model about the same thing, and I only get this experience after some usage and training. Or ... I could have just used Claude. Sure, Claude is money, and Qwen is free, but even with these training loops, I still have to pay for Claude. If I have a Toyota car, and I want it to run better, it's like I'm being told to buy a Ferrari, take pieces out of the engine of the Ferrari, and put them into the Toyota, and then the Toyota will nearly run as good as the Ferrari. But if I bought a Ferrari, why wouldn't I just drive the Ferrari and ditch the Toyota all together? All this is is perpetual distillation, in which I pay for Claude to distill to Qwen to almost function at a Claude level. Interesting that it works, but I have better thing to waste my time with that provide a higher value of return. Not to mention, what about all the time I use Qwen pre-training, the wait time during traing, the post-trained usage where I'm confident in Qwen's results, yet might be engaging it on a topic it hadn't yet been trained and get a bad answer. None of this is useful.

2 2 replies
@ΟΑγγελιοφόρος 2026-07-05

What are the best Hermes agent memory addons? Is obsidian enough?

1 1 replies
@potential900 2026-07-04

Can you check out the StateLM and CaveAgent papers?

1
@JH-zz8is 2026-07-05

It's LLMs all the way down.

0 1 replies
@Adam.Smith411 2026-07-04

More good stuff here. 👏

0
@derrelmack1466 2026-07-05

One of your future videos will be about abstracting  and three piece or more structures broken into math.... 🙂

0
@igorstasenko9183 2026-07-04

Can't wait to see when 1B parameter model with well trained memory skill will outperform all of the beefy Terra-scale models, that require ton of memory and compute to run. This is really way forward - teach a model how to condense and distill the knowledge from the noise, instead of tuning billions of parameters by treating noise as 'useful data to learn' during training.

0
@diga4696 2026-07-04

More epistemic foraging!

0

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot