Navigate Select ESC Close

How We Live In A Collective Dream | Anil Seth On The Neuroscience Of Active Inference

2026-02-27 Education
35.1k
962
118
Essentia Foundation
Essentia Foundation
279.0k subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

Sponsored by Consensus AI: the AI powered science search engine with access to 220+ million studies. Click: https://get.consensus.app/essentia for a free trial of Consensus Pro and 30% discount on a yearly plan. Anil Seth is a world-leading neuroscientist who has made important contributions to our understanding of reality as a controlled hallucination. According to the concept of active inference, our perception of reality is not a direct reflection of the world but, instead, the most accurate guess that our brain can muster, which it continually checks and updates with incoming sensory information. But strange things happen when neuroscientists play around with sensory input in unexpected ways. Anil Seth and his team at Sussex University created the Dream Machine, a stroboscopic device that syncs flickering light to music to induce vivid, often complex, hallucinatory visuals in the viewer. In group sessions, exactly the same white light and music gives rise to a tremendous diversity in perception. Links for more information and reading: Anil’s personal website: https://www.anilseth.com/ The Dream Machine research project: https://dreamachine.world/ The Perception Census research: https://perceptioncensus.dreamachine.world/ Anil Seth (2021), Being You - A New Science of Consciousness https://www.amazon.com/Being-You-New-Science-Consciousness/dp/1524742872/ Gomez-Marin, A., & Seth, A. K. (2025). A science of consciousness beyond pseudo-science and pseudo-consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 28(4), 703–706. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-01913-6 Seth, A. K. (2025). Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25000032 Chapter marks: 0:00 Introduction 2:33 Transition 3:55 Are we seeing the same room? 5:30 A different starting point 7:12 The dream machine research 12:50 We close our eyes in order to see 15:30 Psychedelics and Van Gogh 16:54 Reality as a controlled hallucination 20:21 Predictive inference 21:07 What is active inference? 25:13 What is the free energy principle? 31:29 The value of the free energy principle 38:14 Hans shares his metaphysical journey 40:34 Are you still a materialist? 46:13 An epistemic commitment to materialism 47:27 The limits of neuroscience 50:07 The hard problem of consciousness 53:56 IIT discussed 56:17 Anil on IIT 59:01 Strong IIT vs weak IIT 1:06:22 IIT, cerebrum and cerebellum 1:08:39 Inactive vs inactivated neurons 1:12:45 Physicalism vs idealism 1:21:17 Metaphysics and the meaning of life 1:24:52 On his mother’s deathbed 1:28:09 Honoring form 1:29:35 Being critical of naive materialism 1:31:50 What questions does a metaphysics permit? 1:37:42 Defending IIT with Alex Gomez 1:40:34 If the brain doesn’t produce consciousness 1:42:43 The philosophical zombie argument 1:44:30 Consciousness is not substrate independent 1:46:40 Can AI be conscious? 1:50:05 Is AlphaFold conscious? 1:50:58 Is consciousness computation? 1:54:19 Consciousness as being 'entimed' Ethics statement: Essentia Foundation accepts sponsorships to help us create more and better content but is editorially completely independent. We only accept sponsorships that are compatible with our mission and scientific standards. Copyright © 2026 by Essentia Foundation. All rights reserved.

Top Comments (10)

@84Mogs 2026-03-16

I'm a physicalist that dips his toe into the Essentia Foundation for a bit of escapism. I really love the philosophical and metaphysical ideas behind idealism and panpsychism, but I just can't bring myself round to believing in either. This is why I love Anil Seth, he's a physicalist who's very open minded and more than happy to discuss these concepts without being condescending or superior. A merging of minds as opposed to a battle of wills.

23 7 replies
@chrispmar 2026-03-01

The sense of being someone is the original hallucination. Look into that sense of being someone and you find no one.

22 8 replies
@crunch8484 2026-03-04

You can experiment with this when you go to bed at night. When you get comfortable and close your eyes as you usually do when about to sleep, maintain your focus on the "noise" you see behind your eyelids. Usually, after a few seconds of this, your brain will shut off your visual system leading you into a "thinking" centred consciousness, but instead of allowing this try to actively keep your focus on the noise. After a while the noise will start to form patterns via the bayesian inference process he mentions. Keep the focus and the patterns will become more detailed and more solid, until at some point what you perceive will "pop" into a particularly solid form, as if it were literally there in front of you. An alternative experiment is to do the same, but imagine the view you would see from your bed if your eyes were open. Again, the bayesian inference will fill it in and make it steadily more "real" until you get to the point you can't actually tell if your eyes are open or closed. It's good fun, and for those who sometimes struggle to get to sleep, it's a useful distraction that prevents you ruminating on the fact you're struggling to sleep. Eventually you will drop off anyway.

22 3 replies
@ink-h2s 2026-03-01

I would love to hear a conversation between him and Federico. 🙏🙏

16
@zardoz7900 2026-02-28

I was in deep dreamless sleep and in that state a thought ocured to me that my waking state is a dream. Its weird thinking of it while in a waking state but when it happened it felt true.

14 1 replies
@Liisa3139 2026-02-28

"We don't know what an atom is." That is an argument I have been making for a long time, yet I don't have a complex wordy explanation around that. I'm happy I don't.

9 1 replies
@hannespi2886 2026-03-02

Thank you both deeply for the conversation.

5
@DavidF-eu6ti 2026-03-04

Found myself frustrated and in disagreement with Anil on a few things, but I have a lot of respect for him coming to the channel and taking part in an honest and respectful conversation, and for the mindset in which he approaches things. Would love Essentia to host a moderated discussion between Bernardo and Anil (if Alex Gomes or Koch were involved too that would also work!)

3
@robertmoore3581 2026-05-18

Row, row, row your boat- gently down the stream- merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily. Life is but a dream.

3
@access5870 2026-03-07

Very well said regarding the dangers of believing (falsely m) that AI is or ever can be conscious.

2

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot