String Theory's Leading Contender Disproven?
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Trump contends with HUGE WARNING heading into 2026
Brian Tyler Cohen
87.7k views
Avi Loeb: What Is 3I/ATLAS?
Dr Brian Keating
56.9k views
Avi Loeb's WARNING: Watch Out for THIS When 3i/ATLAS Nears The Sun!
Dr Brian Keating
54.9k views
Does Avi Loeb Have PROOF of Alien Technology?
Dr Brian Keating
78.3k views
OMG: Trump pulls DISGUSTING stunt
Brian Tyler Cohen
326.2k views
David Deutsch: The Quantum Theory No One Dares Explain!
Dr Brian Keating
51.6k views
The Quantum Secret Einstein Tried to Warn Us About
Dr Brian Keating
36.6k views
Avi Loeb: 3I/ATLAS Could Be ALIEN Technology
Dr Brian Keating
108.1k views
The REAL reason why we haven't heard from aliens
Dr Brian Keating
93.1k views
Neutrinos Are Changing Physics Forever
Dr Brian Keating
115.2k views
Top Comments (10)
Flushing LQG doesn't suddenly make ST true. Let's remain reasonable.
Couldn’t Lorentz invariance violation be obscured by anisotropic medium impurity of spacetime itself? If the different wavelength frequencies each resonate slightly differently with “translucent” impurities (wayward atoms) on the way to being observed, that random effect could normalize minute speed variance toward a single quantity. Also, wouldn’t non-uniform expansion of spacetime itself on a Planck scale also be a medium impurity that is normalizing towards a single quantity? You might just need a gamma ray burst of energy observed at a nanometer of distance for spacetime itself to not obscure the differentiation of Lorentz invariance.
Is String Theory our only hope for a Theory of Quantum Gravity?
“Evidence against LQG” does not equate to an “absence of evidence”. Not sure how the Sagan quote about the absence of evidence applies if there is in fact evidence.
Only rules out lorentz invariance violations from a difference in propagation speed that depends on frequency. There are many other ways to break lorentz symmetry though :). To be fair though, thats a very good thing to constrain because a lot of ways to construct a model results in that kind of bias.
I don't think it's a death blow to loop quantum gravity, or that is to say the absence of violations of Lorentz invariance doesn't disprove pixelated SpaceTime. The absence of violations of lorentz invariance does disprove particular models of how the photon could be interacting with a particular model of pixelated spacetime
Where do I cast my vote for the best thumbnail ever 😂
Oh good, we can get back to all the experimental verifications of string theory.
The theory died for 3 min , 3 min in hell is like a eternity.
When i saw the thumbnail I literally thought to myself I'm going straight to comment what does Sheldon Cooper think of this 😂. Didnt expect for the video start with him lol.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Flushing LQG doesn't suddenly make ST true. Let's remain reasonable.
Couldn’t Lorentz invariance violation be obscured by anisotropic medium impurity of spacetime itself? If the different wavelength frequencies each resonate slightly differently with “translucent” impurities (wayward atoms) on the way to being observed, that random effect could normalize minute speed variance toward a single quantity. Also, wouldn’t non-uniform expansion of spacetime itself on a Planck scale also be a medium impurity that is normalizing towards a single quantity? You might just need a gamma ray burst of energy observed at a nanometer of distance for spacetime itself to not obscure the differentiation of Lorentz invariance.
Is String Theory our only hope for a Theory of Quantum Gravity?
“Evidence against LQG” does not equate to an “absence of evidence”. Not sure how the Sagan quote about the absence of evidence applies if there is in fact evidence.
Only rules out lorentz invariance violations from a difference in propagation speed that depends on frequency. There are many other ways to break lorentz symmetry though :). To be fair though, thats a very good thing to constrain because a lot of ways to construct a model results in that kind of bias.
I don't think it's a death blow to loop quantum gravity, or that is to say the absence of violations of Lorentz invariance doesn't disprove pixelated SpaceTime. The absence of violations of lorentz invariance does disprove particular models of how the photon could be interacting with a particular model of pixelated spacetime
Where do I cast my vote for the best thumbnail ever 😂
Oh good, we can get back to all the experimental verifications of string theory.
The theory died for 3 min , 3 min in hell is like a eternity.
When i saw the thumbnail I literally thought to myself I'm going straight to comment what does Sheldon Cooper think of this 😂. Didnt expect for the video start with him lol.