Wikipedia Pressed the Red button on Odin | TheStandup
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
The GTA CEO is so based
The PrimeTime
106.1k views
Recovering from AI Psychosis | TheStandup
The PrimeTime
38.3k views
Why Did They Build This?
The PrimeTime
126.3k views
The Mythos Situation | TheStandup
The PrimeTime
63.3k views
Thanks for all your hard work you are no longer needed | TheStandup
The PrimeTime
65.9k views
we're so back
The PrimeTime
262.9k views
Adults only IDE?
The PrimeTime
118.4k views
What's really going on with AI, Expert weighs in | TheStandup
The PrimeTime
59.7k views
Why is Microsoft updating their text editors!? | TheStandup
The PrimeTime
59.9k views
The Bullsh** Benchmark
The PrimeTime
84.3k views
Top Comments (10)
I'm from Indonesia. The government is trying to ban Wikipedia because it's not registered with the internal business system. All tech companies are required to "pay" the government to run their businesses, but Wikipedia is a non-profit organization. I want everyone to know this because I hate the government.
There is a battle in the background that Wikipedia fights, where companies hire Wikipedia editors, to edit their own company wiki page with propaganda and lies. It's draining on wikipedia editors, and I guess that battle is showing some collateral damage here.
Wikipedia has a rather long page for the brainfuck programming language.
Trash's Red vs Blue answer: Trash-maxxing
Primary and self-published sources seem like a good idea for Wikipedia until you see what marketing staff and contractors do with them.
I tweaked Sam Altman's page to remove "programmer" and nobody has noticed in the 2 years since lol
There is one interesting thread in the deletion discussion where one of the editors pro deletion responds to someone voting for keeping the odin article: "It's reasonable to pose the question, that Odin might be more of a vanity project and self-promotion. The language is very strongly tied and centers around the outspoken persona of "Ginger Bill", as if a cult leader. Jai and Jonathan Blow can be put into this category too, but are way more successful with that strategy and have a much wider following." This seems very much like a personal vendetta to me, as the 'notability' rule can be interpreted in whatever manner fits the majority. Seeing that e.g. also Hyprland has no article, even though its installed on ~20% of Arch desktops while most other random packages have one is telling giving the dev is also controversial.
You find the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect in AI. When you really are deep into a subject, you can get really disappointed or frustrated. Especially in coding. When you don't know much, have not much time, using AI is just fascinating and you don't question much - as you don't know what to question in the results.
Trash running the whole standup in idle xD
That "dispensary" next door to Trash is doing amazing business.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I'm from Indonesia. The government is trying to ban Wikipedia because it's not registered with the internal business system. All tech companies are required to "pay" the government to run their businesses, but Wikipedia is a non-profit organization. I want everyone to know this because I hate the government.
There is a battle in the background that Wikipedia fights, where companies hire Wikipedia editors, to edit their own company wiki page with propaganda and lies. It's draining on wikipedia editors, and I guess that battle is showing some collateral damage here.
Wikipedia has a rather long page for the brainfuck programming language.
Trash's Red vs Blue answer: Trash-maxxing
Primary and self-published sources seem like a good idea for Wikipedia until you see what marketing staff and contractors do with them.
I tweaked Sam Altman's page to remove "programmer" and nobody has noticed in the 2 years since lol
There is one interesting thread in the deletion discussion where one of the editors pro deletion responds to someone voting for keeping the odin article: "It's reasonable to pose the question, that Odin might be more of a vanity project and self-promotion. The language is very strongly tied and centers around the outspoken persona of "Ginger Bill", as if a cult leader. Jai and Jonathan Blow can be put into this category too, but are way more successful with that strategy and have a much wider following." This seems very much like a personal vendetta to me, as the 'notability' rule can be interpreted in whatever manner fits the majority. Seeing that e.g. also Hyprland has no article, even though its installed on ~20% of Arch desktops while most other random packages have one is telling giving the dev is also controversial.
You find the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect in AI. When you really are deep into a subject, you can get really disappointed or frustrated. Especially in coding. When you don't know much, have not much time, using AI is just fascinating and you don't question much - as you don't know what to question in the results.
Trash running the whole standup in idle xD
That "dispensary" next door to Trash is doing amazing business.