Friday Night Live | Depp & Heard Appeals, New Girardi Lawsuit & Updates
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
LIVE | It Ends With Us Federal Lawsuits. New Filings.
Emily D. Baker
208.5k views
Amber Heard Appeals Dismissal of Insurance Lawsuit. The Emily Show Ep 253
Emily D. Baker
139.8k views
LIVE Donna Adelson Court Hearing. Kohberger Case Updates.
Emily D. Baker
109.5k views
Tom Girardi State Bar Scandal! Lawyer Reacts Live
Emily D. Baker
179.4k views
Depp v. Heard Appeal and Amicus Brief Response | Lawyer Reacts
Emily D. Baker
415.1k views
Amber Heard Appeals. Does it have a chance? Housewife Defamation Suits??
Emily D. Baker
470.8k views
Friday Night Live | Emily & Dr. B Chat, Law Nerd Q&A
Emily D. Baker
125.3k views
Lawyer Reacts Live | Johnny Depp Files Appeal!
Emily D. Baker
314.4k views
Friday Night Live | Depp v. Heard Unsealed! First Look At Unsealed Documents.
Emily D. Baker
940.7k views
Friday Night Live | Britney Spears Wins Big In Court!
Emily D. Baker
322.0k views
Top Comments (10)
I’m so tired of Amber Heard. She keeps saying she wants to move on but here we go again with her going at it again.
Re: JD vs AH The jury didn't hear about the 2nd police call during the trial, which in turn made them decide that Waldman's statement was defamatory. It was only us, the public, who knew about the 2nd call. This is again another proof (among other things) against AH's team's claim of the jury being influenced by social media. If they were indeed scrolling thru social media, AH will not win a single thing.
Amber heard uses "moving on" and "beating a dead horse" synonymously.
AH: " I just want to move on" Also AH: "anyways, here's my appeal and why I want a new trial/verdict, also let me explicitly recognize that the appeal will reignite social media and keep the discussion about the trial and everything going"
Download Two Dots for FREE now using my link: https://twodots.onelink.me/8e55/20220720EmilyDBaker
If Amber wants to use "the first amendment" argument, then according to her JD couldn't have defamed her either because he also has "freedom of speech"
I love that the two hour streams that became three hours… have now evolved into 4
If the attorney committed defamation, how can you charge his client? That’s ridiculous. The attorney should be liable.
I would NEVER be shamed into changing my mind about the truth, I believe JD
Elaine: so, you have been a professional for 8 years. Is that correct Emily: ELAAAINE! I’ve been a professional for 15 years.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I’m so tired of Amber Heard. She keeps saying she wants to move on but here we go again with her going at it again.
Re: JD vs AH The jury didn't hear about the 2nd police call during the trial, which in turn made them decide that Waldman's statement was defamatory. It was only us, the public, who knew about the 2nd call. This is again another proof (among other things) against AH's team's claim of the jury being influenced by social media. If they were indeed scrolling thru social media, AH will not win a single thing.
Amber heard uses "moving on" and "beating a dead horse" synonymously.
AH: " I just want to move on" Also AH: "anyways, here's my appeal and why I want a new trial/verdict, also let me explicitly recognize that the appeal will reignite social media and keep the discussion about the trial and everything going"
Download Two Dots for FREE now using my link: https://twodots.onelink.me/8e55/20220720EmilyDBaker
If Amber wants to use "the first amendment" argument, then according to her JD couldn't have defamed her either because he also has "freedom of speech"
I love that the two hour streams that became three hours… have now evolved into 4
If the attorney committed defamation, how can you charge his client? That’s ridiculous. The attorney should be liable.
I would NEVER be shamed into changing my mind about the truth, I believe JD
Elaine: so, you have been a professional for 8 years. Is that correct Emily: ELAAAINE! I’ve been a professional for 15 years.