LIVE Mr. Beast Sued By BeastBurger Lawyer Reacts. Kohberger Alibi issues.
Related videos
LIVE | Kohberger Juror Questions Continue. Jelly Roll sued. Tik Tok and more.
Emily D. Baker
92.0k views
LIVE | Kohberger's "Alibi". New Special Prosecutor Against Alec Baldwin.
Emily D. Baker
156.9k views
LIVE Kohberger Motion Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
91.2k views
LIVE Food Court! Mr. Beast Burger. Starbucks Sued. Texas Pete and more.
Emily D. Baker
83.6k views
LIVE Lawyer Reacts Kohberger Hearing Part 2, the Lawyers Argue.
Emily D. Baker
138.2k views
LIVE Lawyer Reacts Bryan Kohberger Idaho Court Hearings
Emily D. Baker
165.0k views
LIVE Lawyer Reacts. The Lizzo Lawsuit. This is bananas.
Emily D. Baker
382.3k views
LIVE | Kohberger "Alibi" Not Gonna Fly Plus Motion To Dismiss?
Emily D. Baker
105.7k views
LIVE | New Filings by Bryan Kohberger in Idaho. TikTok Sues Montana?
Emily D. Baker
109.8k views
LIVE Breaking NEWS!! Bryan Kohberger Indicted in Idaho!
Emily D. Baker
124.6k views
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
LIVE | Kohberger Juror Questions Continue. Jelly Roll sued. Tik Tok and more.
Emily D. Baker
92.0k views
LIVE | Kohberger's "Alibi". New Special Prosecutor Against Alec Baldwin.
Emily D. Baker
156.9k views
LIVE Kohberger Motion Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
91.2k views
LIVE Food Court! Mr. Beast Burger. Starbucks Sued. Texas Pete and more.
Emily D. Baker
83.6k views
LIVE Lawyer Reacts Kohberger Hearing Part 2, the Lawyers Argue.
Emily D. Baker
138.2k views
LIVE Lawyer Reacts Bryan Kohberger Idaho Court Hearings
Emily D. Baker
165.0k views
LIVE Lawyer Reacts. The Lizzo Lawsuit. This is bananas.
Emily D. Baker
382.3k views
LIVE | Kohberger "Alibi" Not Gonna Fly Plus Motion To Dismiss?
Emily D. Baker
105.7k views
LIVE | New Filings by Bryan Kohberger in Idaho. TikTok Sues Montana?
Emily D. Baker
109.8k views
LIVE Breaking NEWS!! Bryan Kohberger Indicted in Idaho!
Emily D. Baker
124.6k views
Top Comments (10)
Replay crew. Thank you for the time stamps. Your hard work on these cases is much appreciated!
while i dont personally like nate the lawyer, i very much disagree with that judges decision, there is a reason why twitter had to start putting those fact check notifications on tweets, because people believe tweets when they are knowingly (and usually easily googleable) false. To state that because it is on twitter it should be an assumed opinion is SO wrong, and I actually think something should be done about that. Nate's case should not have een dismissed like that, and i really hope he fights the decision although I understand why he wouldn't if that judge will be there.
If anything said on Twitter is opinion according to this judge, did she just open up the entire world to saying the most heinous things possible about her and testing that theory?
I am not an X user, but defamation is stating untrue facts about someone that is defaming someone. This case is clear defamation. This judge should resign, in my opinion.
This judges decision scares me, to suggest that defamation can’t occur on twitter feels like a slippery slope and the repercussions are terrible!!!
Judge: Bouzy admits here that he intentionally lied Also judge: Brody hasn't proved that Bouzy knowingly lied This judge is either illiterate or entirely mentally deficient.
I'm currently listening to the Nate v. Bouzy segment, and that dismissal is BS. The things Bouzy claimed were absolutely defamatory, presented as fact, and as I recall, Bouzy acknowledged that he knew his claims were false. The fact that the claims were made on Twitter shouldn't make an ounce of difference. It's a public forum, and even if people *should* take such statements with a grain of salt, that doesn't mean they do, especially if the statement is made by someone presenting themselves as a a figure of trust and that their statements are true. Just because *YOU* don't find Twitter credible, Madam Judge, doesn't mean the masses don't.
Darn, this Judge got this wrong. 👩🏻⚖️.. ughhhh. I hate this for Nate. I hope Karma comes knocking on Bouzys door. 😡
Part live stream, part replay crew... When work gets in the way of EDB.
The judge accepted Bouzy lied but denied defamation. If she saw the outrageousness and trolling, she should have found malice.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Replay crew. Thank you for the time stamps. Your hard work on these cases is much appreciated!
while i dont personally like nate the lawyer, i very much disagree with that judges decision, there is a reason why twitter had to start putting those fact check notifications on tweets, because people believe tweets when they are knowingly (and usually easily googleable) false. To state that because it is on twitter it should be an assumed opinion is SO wrong, and I actually think something should be done about that. Nate's case should not have een dismissed like that, and i really hope he fights the decision although I understand why he wouldn't if that judge will be there.
If anything said on Twitter is opinion according to this judge, did she just open up the entire world to saying the most heinous things possible about her and testing that theory?
I am not an X user, but defamation is stating untrue facts about someone that is defaming someone. This case is clear defamation. This judge should resign, in my opinion.
This judges decision scares me, to suggest that defamation can’t occur on twitter feels like a slippery slope and the repercussions are terrible!!!
Judge: Bouzy admits here that he intentionally lied Also judge: Brody hasn't proved that Bouzy knowingly lied This judge is either illiterate or entirely mentally deficient.
I'm currently listening to the Nate v. Bouzy segment, and that dismissal is BS. The things Bouzy claimed were absolutely defamatory, presented as fact, and as I recall, Bouzy acknowledged that he knew his claims were false. The fact that the claims were made on Twitter shouldn't make an ounce of difference. It's a public forum, and even if people *should* take such statements with a grain of salt, that doesn't mean they do, especially if the statement is made by someone presenting themselves as a a figure of trust and that their statements are true. Just because *YOU* don't find Twitter credible, Madam Judge, doesn't mean the masses don't.
Darn, this Judge got this wrong. 👩🏻⚖️.. ughhhh. I hate this for Nate. I hope Karma comes knocking on Bouzys door. 😡
Part live stream, part replay crew... When work gets in the way of EDB.
The judge accepted Bouzy lied but denied defamation. If she saw the outrageousness and trolling, she should have found malice.