“Current Evidence Does NOT Support Zone 2 Training”
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
What’s Causing Colon Cancer to Rise So Fast?
Dr Brad Stanfield
22.4k views
We Were Wrong About Aspirin (New Evidence)
Dr Brad Stanfield
29.8k views
99% of Heart Attacks Had This Prior Warning
Dr Brad Stanfield
28.3k views
This $2 Remedy Beats Every Cold Medicine
Dr Brad Stanfield
50.4k views
The Anti-Aging Supplement Scam (New Evidence)
Dr Brad Stanfield
23.3k views
The Truth About Nitric Oxide Supplements Revealed
Dr Brad Stanfield
30.4k views
The Most Important Antioxidant Study I’ve Ever Read
Dr Brad Stanfield
34.5k views
The EXACT Moment I Stopped Fearing Dementia
Dr Brad Stanfield
22.6k views
Breakthrough Cuts Heart Disease by 25%
Dr Brad Stanfield
22.2k views
New Vitamin D Study on Telomeres and Aging
Dr Brad Stanfield
57.6k views
Top Comments (10)
It's certainly better than sitting on a couch.
I'm not an elite athlete, I'm just a 56 year old man that decided to run a 50k, and I don't do zone 2 training for the benefits this study is talking about - I do it so I can run faster with a lower heart rate and to get enough miles in to be able to run for 7+ hours without getting injured. Before this video I'd never even heard of these in relation to zone 2 training. I feel like saying "Current Evidence Does NOT Support Zone 2 Training" is kinda click-bait because this study was just looking at these two metrics - not the reason runners actually do zone 2 training.
None of this is why I do zone 2. I do it for brain health, joint health, low impact, increase in arterial nitric oxide (when done with closed mouth), relaxed mind (nasal breathing stimulates the parasympathetic nervous system), and weight loss. I know HIIT is great for mitochondria. Who is saying Zone 2 is better for that? Why would anyone say Zone 2 is better for VO2 max? If you want better VO2-max, do exercise that looks like the test. And just because you optimize for a test, that does not mean you necessarily gain the advantages normally seen with a higher score without the nearly identical exercise. If I built up my hand grip to 240 lb, does that mean I get all the benefits seen when people were tested on grip strength? Almost no one accepts that, but why should exercise designed to give higher VO2 max be any different? Has there ever been a test that shows that increasing VO2 Max increases all the things associated with a higher score? Zone 2 has done incredible things for me. I am just having difficulty fitting it into my day. Different forms of exercise have different benefits. There is a role for each of these: cardio, HIIT, resistance, and isometric. And there are benefits for other aspects of exercise: core, balance, coordination, and stretching.
I think a lot of the benefits of Z2 is that it allows you to exercise MORE. If you don't have the time to exercise 10+ hours a week you don't have the problem that Z2 is trying to solve.
The conclusion is not that zone 2 has no effect, but rather that time of activity in zone 2 is necessary for it to have an effect.
Agree! Athletes train fully recovered, and with huge weekly loads they have to control intensity -- that’s why Zone 2 exists. But if you only work out ~2h a week, higher intensity will give a stronger stimulus for adaptation.
Perhaps the studies are showing the importance of having both types of exercise in one’s fitness routine.
As an attorney, I’m amazed at how similar the practice of law is to medicine. Even down to the human aspect of interpreting facts in each study.
All 8 studies referenced in the video are linked in the video's description 💊Supplements that Dr Brad takes: https://drstanfield.com/pages/my-supplements 💊MicroVitamin (multivitamin & mineral that I take): https://drstanfield.com/products/microvitamin For extra insights + a free health checklist, sign up here 👉 https://drstanfield.com/pages/sign-up
My solution is to shoot in all directions and cover all zones 😅
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
It's certainly better than sitting on a couch.
I'm not an elite athlete, I'm just a 56 year old man that decided to run a 50k, and I don't do zone 2 training for the benefits this study is talking about - I do it so I can run faster with a lower heart rate and to get enough miles in to be able to run for 7+ hours without getting injured. Before this video I'd never even heard of these in relation to zone 2 training. I feel like saying "Current Evidence Does NOT Support Zone 2 Training" is kinda click-bait because this study was just looking at these two metrics - not the reason runners actually do zone 2 training.
None of this is why I do zone 2. I do it for brain health, joint health, low impact, increase in arterial nitric oxide (when done with closed mouth), relaxed mind (nasal breathing stimulates the parasympathetic nervous system), and weight loss. I know HIIT is great for mitochondria. Who is saying Zone 2 is better for that? Why would anyone say Zone 2 is better for VO2 max? If you want better VO2-max, do exercise that looks like the test. And just because you optimize for a test, that does not mean you necessarily gain the advantages normally seen with a higher score without the nearly identical exercise. If I built up my hand grip to 240 lb, does that mean I get all the benefits seen when people were tested on grip strength? Almost no one accepts that, but why should exercise designed to give higher VO2 max be any different? Has there ever been a test that shows that increasing VO2 Max increases all the things associated with a higher score? Zone 2 has done incredible things for me. I am just having difficulty fitting it into my day. Different forms of exercise have different benefits. There is a role for each of these: cardio, HIIT, resistance, and isometric. And there are benefits for other aspects of exercise: core, balance, coordination, and stretching.
I think a lot of the benefits of Z2 is that it allows you to exercise MORE. If you don't have the time to exercise 10+ hours a week you don't have the problem that Z2 is trying to solve.
The conclusion is not that zone 2 has no effect, but rather that time of activity in zone 2 is necessary for it to have an effect.
Agree! Athletes train fully recovered, and with huge weekly loads they have to control intensity -- that’s why Zone 2 exists. But if you only work out ~2h a week, higher intensity will give a stronger stimulus for adaptation.
Perhaps the studies are showing the importance of having both types of exercise in one’s fitness routine.
As an attorney, I’m amazed at how similar the practice of law is to medicine. Even down to the human aspect of interpreting facts in each study.
All 8 studies referenced in the video are linked in the video's description 💊Supplements that Dr Brad takes: https://drstanfield.com/pages/my-supplements 💊MicroVitamin (multivitamin & mineral that I take): https://drstanfield.com/products/microvitamin For extra insights + a free health checklist, sign up here 👉 https://drstanfield.com/pages/sign-up
My solution is to shoot in all directions and cover all zones 😅